Hysteroscopy for Assessing Fallopian Tubal Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis

被引:26
作者
Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni [1 ]
Carugno, Jose [2 ]
Riemma, Gaetano [3 ]
Torok, Peter [4 ]
Cianci, Stefano [3 ]
De Franciscis, Pasquale [3 ]
Parry, John Preston [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catania, Dept Gen Surg & Med Surg Specialties, Obstet & Gynecol Unit, Via Santa Sofia 78, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Minimally Invas Gynecol Unit, Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci Dept, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Woman Child & Gen & Specialized Surg, Obstet & Gynecol Unit, Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Debrecen, Inst Obstet & Gynaecol, Fac Med, Debrecen, Hungary
[5] Parryscope & Posit Steps Fertil, Madison, MS USA
[6] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
关键词
Infertility; Tubal patency; Chromopertubation; HYSTEROSALPINGO-CONTRAST-SONOGRAPHY; OFFICE HYSTEROSCOPY; PATENCY; INFERTILITY; CHROMOPERTUBATION; LAPAROSCOPY; HYCOSY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy compared with that of laparoscopic chromopertubation for the detection of fallopian tubal obstruction. Data Sources: An electronic search from inception to March 31, 2020, was performed in Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Methods of Study Selection: This diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Synthesizing Evidence from Diagnostic Accuracy Tests recommendations. A combination of the following Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords was included in the search strategy: ?hysteroscopy[MeSH],? ?tubal obstruction,? ?tubal patency,? ?tubal dysfunction,? and ?tubal blockage.? Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies?2 (University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom). Publication bias was evaluated by means of the Deek funnel plot asymmetry test. The following outcomes were analyzed: diagnostic odds ratio, area under hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic and area under receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Tabulation, Integration, and Results: Six studies comparing hysteroscopy with laparoscopic chromopertubation were included in the meta-analysis. After pooling all the studies, the diagnostic odds ratio was 43. The evaluated area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93, correlating with high diagnostic accuracy for the index test. Sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 85%, respectively. In addition, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.88 and 0.16, respectively. Conclusion: Hysteroscopic techniques are highly accurate and sensitive for detecting fallopian tubal obstruction. Interventional assessment enhances diagnostic accuracy compared with observational assessment, as does the office setting compared with the operating room. Additional studies, along with a refinement of the techniques, could facilitate the widespread use of hysteroscopic techniques for the detection of fallopian tube occlusion. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2021) 28, 769?778. ? 2020 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 778
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Non-pharmacological pain control in outpatient hysteroscopies [J].
Amer-Cuenca, Juan J. ;
Marin-Buck, Alejandro ;
Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni ;
La Rosa, Valentina Lucia ;
Caruso, Salvatore ;
Cianci, Antonio ;
Lison, Juan F. .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 29 (01) :10-19
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Obstet Gynecol, V133, pe377, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003271
[3]   Operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia: Analysis of 4863 cases performed with mechanical instruments [J].
Bettocchi, S ;
Ceci, O ;
Nappi, L ;
Di Venere, R ;
Masciopinto, V ;
Pansini, V ;
Pinto, L ;
Santoro, A ;
Cormio, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2004, 11 (01) :59-61
[4]   Office hysteroscopy [J].
Bettocchi, S ;
Nappi, L ;
Ceci, O ;
Selvaggi, L .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 31 (03) :641-+
[5]   Assessment of Fallopian tube patency by HyCoSy:: comparison of a positive contrast agent with saline solution [J].
Boudghène, FP ;
Bazot, M ;
Robert, Y ;
Perrot, N ;
Rocourt, N ;
Antoine, JM ;
Morris, H ;
Leroy, JL ;
Uzan, S ;
Bigot, JM .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (05) :525-530
[6]   Office hysteroscopic-guided selective tubal chromopertubation: acceptability, feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of this new diagnostic non-invasive technique in infertile women [J].
Carta, Gaspare ;
Palermo, Patrizia ;
Pasquale, Chiara ;
Conte, Valeria ;
Pulcinella, Ruggero ;
Necozione, Stefano ;
Cofini, Vincenza ;
Patacchiola, Felice .
HUMAN FERTILITY, 2018, 21 (02) :106-111
[7]   An ultrasound-based approach to the assessment of infertility, including the evaluation of tubal patency [J].
Ekerhovd, E ;
Fried, G ;
Granberg, S .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) :13-28
[8]   Hysteroscopic Assessment of Tubal Patency: A Randomized Comparison between the Flow and Parryscope Techniques [J].
Hager, Marlene ;
Ott, Johannes ;
Holzer, Iris ;
Seemann, Rudolf ;
Kurz, Christine ;
Parry, John Preston .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (07) :1552-+
[9]   The Role of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in the Evaluation of Fallopian Tube Patency: a Short Review [J].
Hager, Marlene ;
Simek, Inga Malin ;
Promberger, Regina ;
Ott, Johannes .
GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2019, 79 (05) :483-486
[10]   Comparison of Assessment Methods for Fallopian Tubal Patency and Peritubal Adhesion Between Transvaginal 4-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonographyand Laparoscopic Chromopertubation [J].
He, Yanni ;
Ma, Xiaohui ;
Xu, Jingjiao ;
Li, Sushu ;
Wu, Haorong ;
Liu, Qiuxiang ;
Kong, Linghong ;
Luo, Juan ;
Liu, Hongmei .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (03) :547-556