Effects of colon cancer risk counseling for first-degree relatives

被引:46
作者
Glanz, Karen
Steffen, Alana D.
Taglialatela, Lauren A.
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii, Canc Res Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[3] Kennesaw State Univ, Dept Psychol, Kennesaw, GA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0914
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Individuals with a first-degree relative who has had colorectal cancer are at increased risk for colorectal cancer and thus can benefit from early detection. Tailored risk counseling may increase adherence to screening guidelines in these persons. The present study evaluated a culturally sensitive Colon Cancer Risk Counseling (CCRC) intervention for relatives of colorectal cancer patients. Methods: A randomized trial evaluated personalized CCRC sessions with print materials and follow-up phone calls compared with a comparable General Health Counseling (GHC) intervention. One hundred and seventy-six siblings and children of colorectal cancer patients, living in Hawaii, were assessed at baseline and 4 and 12 months after intervention. Physician verification of colorectal cancer screening reports supplemented survey data. Results: The CCRC intervention had a significant treatment effect at 4 months (13% greater increase than for GHC that plateaued to a trend at 12 months. For those who were nonadherent at baseline, the CCRC led to a 17% net increase in screening adherence. Participants rated the CCRC intervention better than GHC for the amount and usefulness of new information. Conclusions: Using a study design that compared risk counseling to an attention-matched and tailored control condition provided a rigorous test of CCRC that emphasized the relevance of family experience with colorectal cancer. The combination face-to-face, phone, and small media risk counseling intervention for people with a family history of colorectal cancer should be considered for adoption in health care and public health settings.
引用
收藏
页码:1485 / 1491
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], US CANC STAT 1999 20
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Cancer Facts and Figures
[3]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[4]   Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: A meta-analysis [J].
Butterworth, AS ;
Higgins, JPT ;
Pharoah, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (02) :216-227
[5]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006, BEH RISK FACT SURV S
[6]   INTEREST IN GENETIC TESTING FOR COLON CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY - COGNITIVE AND EMOTIONAL CORRELATES [J].
CROYLE, RT ;
LERMAN, C .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (02) :284-292
[7]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF THE IMPACT OF RISK ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK ON PARTICIPATION IN MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING [J].
CURRY, SJ ;
TAPLIN, SH ;
ANDERMAN, C ;
BARLOW, WE ;
MCBRIDE, C .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (03) :350-360
[8]   Tailored computer-based cancer risk communication: Correcting colorectal cancer risk perception [J].
Emmons, KM ;
Wong, M ;
Puleo, E ;
Weinstein, N ;
Fletcher, R ;
Colditz, G .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2004, 9 (02) :127-141
[9]   THE IMPACT OF GENETIC-COUNSELING ON RISK PERCEPTION IN WOMEN WITH A FAMILY HISTORY OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
EVANS, DGR ;
BLAIR, V ;
GREENHALGH, R ;
HOPWOOD, P ;
HOWELL, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 70 (05) :934-938
[10]  
Glanz K, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P635