Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence free survival after radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins

被引:6
作者
Roux, V. [1 ]
Eyraud, R. [1 ]
Brureau, L. [1 ]
Gourtaud, G. [1 ]
Senechal, C. [1 ]
Fofana, M. [1 ]
Blanchet, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Hosp Univ Pointe A Pitre, Serv Urol, Route Chauvel, F-97159 Pointe a Pitre, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2017年 / 27卷 / 8-9期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Surgical margins; Biochemical recurrence; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; CANCER RECURRENCE; ANTIGEN; RADIOTHERAPY; PROBABILITY; PROGRESSION; PREDICTOR; FAILURE; GRADE; TUMOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2017.05.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose. - Research of predictive factors of biochemical recurrence to guide the establishment of an adjuvant treatment after radical prostatectomy for cancer with positive surgical margins. Methodology. - A retrospective cohort of 1577 afro-caribbean patients undergoing radical prostatectomy operated between 1st January 2000 and 1st July 2013 was analyzed. In this cohort, 406 patients had positive surgical margin, we excluded 11 patients who received adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy, hormonotherapy, radio-hormonotherapy) and 2 patients for whom histological analysis of the surgical specimen was for a pT4 pathological stage. After a descriptive analysis, we used a Cox model to took for predictors of survival without biochemical recurrence then, depending on the significant variables, we separated our population into six groups: stage pT2 with Gleason score <= 3 + 4 (group 1), stage pT2 with a score of Gleason >= 4 + 3 (group 2), stage pT3a with a Gleason core <= 3 + 4 (group 3), pT3a stage with a score of Gleason >= 4 + 3 (group 4), stage pT3b with a Gleason score <= 3 + 4 (group 5) and stage pT3b Gleason >= with a score of 4 + 3 (group 6) and compared survival without biochemical recurrence using a log rank test. After radical prostatectomy with surgical margins with an anatomopathological stage <= pT3b, a Gleason score >= 4 + 3 had a pejorative survival without biochemical recurrence than pathological stage (P < 0.001). Results. - In multivariate analysis, predictors of survival without biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins were the majority Gleason postoperative (P < 0.0001), pathological stage (P = 0.049) adjusted preoperative PSA (P = 0.826), with the body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.59) and tumor volume (P = 0.95). Conclusion. - A high postoperatively Gleason score (>= 4+3) has a better predictive value of biochemical recurrence than pathological stage pT2 or pT3 at the patients having been treated for prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 473
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Iocca, A ;
Scherer, B ;
Zincke, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (01) :119-125
[2]   Preliminary results for EORTC trial 22911: radical prostatectomy followed by postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancers with a high risk of progression [J].
Bolla, M. ;
Van Poppelb, H. ;
Collettec, L. .
CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2007, 11 (6-7) :363-369
[3]   Tumor Grade at Margins of Resection in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Is an Independent Predictor of Prognosis [J].
Brimo, Fadi ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (05) :1206-1209
[4]   Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Multiplicative Interaction Between Surgical Margin Status and Pathological Stage [J].
Budaeus, Lars ;
Isbarn, Hendrik ;
Eichelberg, Christian ;
Lughezzani, Giovanni ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Perrotte, Paul ;
Chun, Felix K. H. ;
Salomon, Georg ;
Steuber, Thomas ;
Koellermann, Jens ;
Sauter, Guido ;
Ahyai, Sascha A. ;
Zacharias, Mario ;
Fisch, Margit ;
Schlomm, Thorsten ;
Haese, Alexander ;
Heinzer, Hans ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (04) :1341-1346
[5]   The Gleason Score of Tumor at the Margin in Radical Prostatectomy is Predictive of Biochemical Recurrence [J].
Cao, Dengfeng ;
Kibel, Adam S. ;
Gao, Feng ;
Tao, Yu ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 34 (07) :994-1001
[6]   Prostate cancer surgical margin. CCAFU review [J].
Cormier, L. ;
Bastide, C. ;
Beuzeboc, P. ;
Fromont, G. ;
Hennequin, C. ;
Mongiat-Artus, P. ;
Peyromaure, M. ;
Ploussard, G. ;
Renard-Penna, R. ;
Richaud, P. ;
Rozet, F. ;
Soulie, M. ;
Salomon, L. .
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2014, 24 (06) :334-345
[7]   Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer [J].
Daly, Tiffany ;
Hickey, Brigid E. ;
Lehman, Margot ;
Francis, Daniel P. ;
See, Adrienne M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (12)
[8]   Benign positive margins after radical prostatectomy means a poor prognosis - Pro [J].
Djavan, B ;
Milani, S ;
Fong, YK .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (02) :218-220
[9]   Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Eastham, JA ;
Kattan, MW ;
Riedel, E ;
Begg, CB ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Gerigk, C ;
Gonen, M ;
Reuter, V ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :2292-2295
[10]   Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Eastham, James A. ;
Kurolwa, Kentaro ;
Ohorl, Makoto ;
Serlo, Angel M. ;
Gorbonos, Alex ;
Maru, Norio ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Slawin, Kevin M. ;
Wheeler, Thomas M. ;
Reuter, Victor E. ;
Scardino, Peter T. .
UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (05) :965-969