Robot Transparency and Team Orientation Effects on Human?Robot Teaming

被引:31
作者
Guznov, S. [1 ]
Lyons, J. [1 ]
Pfahler, M. [2 ]
Heironimus, A. [3 ]
Woolley, M. [4 ]
Friedman, J. [5 ]
Neimeier, A. [6 ]
机构
[1] US Air Force, Res Lab, Dayton, OH 45404 USA
[2] Cognit Performance Res Dept, Dayton, OH USA
[3] Oak Ridge Inst Sci & Educ, Grad Student Program, Belcamp, MD USA
[4] Wright State Univ, Dept Psychol, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[5] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Dept Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[6] Northern Kentucky Univ, Dept Psychol, Highland Hts, KY 41076 USA
关键词
SITUATION AWARENESS; AGENT TRANSPARENCY; TRUST; AUTOMATION; PERFORMANCE; WORKLOAD; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/10447318.2019.1676519
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Human?robot team members often have to interact in a situation when the team members are not physically collocated requiring effective communication to establish and maintain effective human?robot performance. Previous research suggests that characteristics of robot communication can have positive impact on human?robot interaction outcomes such as trust, situation awareness, workload, and performance. In this study, we investigated the joint effects of robot communication transparency (low to high, increasing the amount of information provided through text messages) and team orientation (i.e., robot?s text messages communicating team membership with We statements) properties of messages sent by a ground robot to a human teammate who was responsible for supervisory control. The results showed both benefits and limitations of increased transparency indicating the importance of careful implementation of transparency methods. Team orientation manipulation showed to be ineffective (and potentially detrimental) also indicating that caution needs to be exercised when implementing elements intended to improve group cohesion and team inclusiveness. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:650 / 660
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]   Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers [J].
Nass, C ;
Moon, Y .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2000, 56 (01) :81-103
[42]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SUBJECTIVE WORKLOAD MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES - IMPLICATIONS FOR THEIR USE IN THE ASSESSMENT OF PERCEIVED MENTAL WORKLOAD [J].
NYGREN, TE .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1991, 33 (01) :17-33
[43]  
Ososky S., 2013, 2013 AAAI SPRING S S, P60
[44]   Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults [J].
Pak, Richard ;
Fink, Nicole ;
Price, Margaux ;
Bass, Brock ;
Sturre, Lindsay .
ERGONOMICS, 2012, 55 (09) :1059-1072
[45]  
PARK E, 2008, 7 JFPS INT S FLUID P
[46]   Managing workload in human-robot interaction: A review of empirical studies [J].
Prewett, Matthew S. ;
Johnson, Ryan C. ;
Saboe, Kristin N. ;
Elliott, Linda R. ;
Coovert, Michael D. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2010, 26 (05) :840-856
[47]  
Sadler G., 2016, 2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/DASC.2016.7777998
[48]   Is there a "big five" in teamwork? [J].
Salas, E ;
Sims, DE ;
Burke, CS .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2005, 36 (05) :555-599
[49]   On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments [J].
Salas, Eduardo ;
Cooke, Nancy J. ;
Rosen, Michael A. .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2008, 50 (03) :540-547
[50]  
Sanders TL, 2014, 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INTER-DISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE METHODS IN SITUATION AWARENESS AND DECISION SUPPORT (COGSIMA), P156, DOI 10.1109/CogSIMA.2014.6816556