Robot Transparency and Team Orientation Effects on Human?Robot Teaming

被引:31
作者
Guznov, S. [1 ]
Lyons, J. [1 ]
Pfahler, M. [2 ]
Heironimus, A. [3 ]
Woolley, M. [4 ]
Friedman, J. [5 ]
Neimeier, A. [6 ]
机构
[1] US Air Force, Res Lab, Dayton, OH 45404 USA
[2] Cognit Performance Res Dept, Dayton, OH USA
[3] Oak Ridge Inst Sci & Educ, Grad Student Program, Belcamp, MD USA
[4] Wright State Univ, Dept Psychol, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[5] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Dept Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[6] Northern Kentucky Univ, Dept Psychol, Highland Hts, KY 41076 USA
关键词
SITUATION AWARENESS; AGENT TRANSPARENCY; TRUST; AUTOMATION; PERFORMANCE; WORKLOAD; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/10447318.2019.1676519
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Human?robot team members often have to interact in a situation when the team members are not physically collocated requiring effective communication to establish and maintain effective human?robot performance. Previous research suggests that characteristics of robot communication can have positive impact on human?robot interaction outcomes such as trust, situation awareness, workload, and performance. In this study, we investigated the joint effects of robot communication transparency (low to high, increasing the amount of information provided through text messages) and team orientation (i.e., robot?s text messages communicating team membership with We statements) properties of messages sent by a ground robot to a human teammate who was responsible for supervisory control. The results showed both benefits and limitations of increased transparency indicating the importance of careful implementation of transparency methods. Team orientation manipulation showed to be ineffective (and potentially detrimental) also indicating that caution needs to be exercised when implementing elements intended to improve group cohesion and team inclusiveness. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:650 / 660
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Adams B.D., 2003, Trust in automated systems literature review
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ROMAN 2006, DOI DOI 10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314398
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, PROC HUM FACTORS SOC, DOI DOI 10.1177/154193129003400919
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, P AAAI SPRING S SER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, P 2013 INT C INTELLI, DOI DOI 10.1145/2449396.2449445
[7]  
[Anonymous], NAT AER EL C NAECON
[8]   Automation-induced complacency for monitoring highly reliable systems: the role of task complexity, system experience, and operator trust [J].
Bailey, N. R. ;
Scerbo, M. W. .
THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2007, 8 (04) :321-348
[9]  
Barelka A. J., INVESTIGATING UNPUB
[10]  
Bruemmer D. J., 2002, P 7 C HUM FACT POW P