A hybrid fuzzy COPRAS-base-criterion method for multi-criteria decision making

被引:18
作者
Narang, Monika [1 ]
Joshi, M. C. [1 ]
Pal, A. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kumaun Univ, Dept Math, DSB Campus, Naini Tal, India
[2] Govind Ballabh Pant Univ Agr & Technol, Coll Basic Sci & Humanities, Dept Math Stat & Comp Sci, Pantnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Base-criterion method; Fuzzy COPRAS; TFNs; EMA; Portfolio; SELECTION; SUPPLIER; MCDM;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-021-05762-w
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multiple criteria decision making is a mathematical tool for dealing with complex problems like best or optimal selection from various choices. Fuzzy set theory provides a soft computing framework for precise and rigorous study of vague conceptual environment. In this paper, a new hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method consists of group fuzzy COPRAS, and fuzzy BCM is proposed. The aim of the proposed method is to enhance the practical approach of soft computing in selection of stocks for portfolio construction and better return. This method has been executed in two phases. First, using a novel base-criterion method with triangular fuzzy number, the relative optimal weights of specified criteria are extracted from group decision-making process. Then, an approach based on the combination of fuzzy set theory and the complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) is applied to rank the alternatives in uncertain and ambiguous environment. A practical implementation of proposed method in stock selection is another realistic approach of our study. Portfolio is constructed by using the ranking obtained by proposed model. The weight allocation of the stocks is calculated using the ranked assets algorithm. Execution of the proposed model is found to be dominant when compared with the previous studies. The result ensures that the portfolio is capable of giving better returns based on the proposed ranking.
引用
收藏
页码:8391 / 8399
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Alinezhad A., 2019, New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM). International Series in Operations Research Management Science, V1st
  • [2] Azmi, 2016, J BUS FINANC AFF, V5, P1
  • [3] On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers
    Carlsson, C
    Fullér, R
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 122 (02) : 315 - 326
  • [4] Neutrino masses, leptogenesis and decaying dark matter
    Chen, Chuan-Hung
    Geng, Chao-Qiang
    Zhuridov, Dmitry V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2009, (10):
  • [5] Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II approach: A new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems
    Chen, Na
    Xu, Zeshui
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 292 : 175 - 197
  • [6] Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    Yavuz, Serkan
    Kilinc, Nevzat
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) : 8143 - 8151
  • [7] MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION IN RIVER BASIN DEVELOPMENT
    DUCKSTEIN, L
    OPRICOVIC, S
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1980, 16 (01) : 14 - 20
  • [8] Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications
    Guo, Sen
    Zhao, Haoran
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 121 : 23 - 31
  • [9] Optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station by using fuzzy TOPSIS based on sustainability perspective
    Guo, Sen
    Zhao, Huiru
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 158 : 390 - 402
  • [10] Haseli G., 2020, International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, V6, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S40819-020-00807-4