Challenges ahead for federal technology assessment

被引:0
作者
Neumann, Peter J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, New England Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.w150
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Sean Tunis and colleagues provide an excellent critique of current federal activities to assess new medical technology. These efforts generally do not involve primary data collection but rather reflect attempts to better synthesize existing information, to make conditional coverage decisions based on the data, and to increase coordination among government agencies. Many challenges remain on analytical, logistical, legal, and political fronts. Researchers and analysts should be more precise about what "rapid learning" means and strive to measure performance. Efforts are also needed to prioritize research, to communicate it to decisionmakers, to involve stakeholders in the process, and to include cost-effectiveness information.
引用
收藏
页码:W150 / W152
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] When is evidence sufficient?
    Claxton, K
    Cohen, JT
    Neumann, PJ
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [2] Evidence of evidence-based health policy: The politics of systematic reviews in coverage decisions
    Fox, DM
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (01) : 114 - 122
  • [3] Medicare's national coverage decisions, 1999-2003: Quality of evidence and review times
    Neumann, PJ
    Divi, N
    Beinfeld, MT
    Levine, BS
    Keenan, PS
    Halpern, EF
    Gazelle, GS
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (01) : 243 - 254
  • [4] Federal initiatives to support rapid learning about new technologies
    Tunis, Sean R.
    Carino, Tanisha V.
    Williams, Reginald D., II
    Bach, Peter B.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2007, 26 (02) : W140 - W149
  • [5] Coverage options for promising technologies: Medicare's 'coverage with evidence development'
    Tunis, Sean R.
    Pearson, Steven D.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (05) : 1218 - 1230