Contract Cheating in Computer Science: A Case Study

被引:10
作者
Manoharan, Sathiamoorthy [1 ]
Speidel, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Sch Comp Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING, ASSESSMENT, AND LEARNING FOR ENGINEERING (IEEE TALE 2020) | 2020年
关键词
positive learning; academic dishonesty; contract cheating; student assessment; plagiarism; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1109/TALE48869.2020.9368454
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contract cheating has recently become much more prevalent and threatens to render higher education grades meaningless. Online contract cheating services are not only easily accessible hut, most importantly, highly affordable. We report on a case study investigating how students use one particular online tutoring company to purchase solutions to their computer science assignments. Taking the perspective of a typical student, we uploaded several assignment questions and solicited solutions, looking at factors such as quality and time taken to procure the answers, and the tutoring company's diligence in acting on clear violations of their own honor code. The results show that purchasing solutions for homework questions is both easy and cheap. Solutions for questions at CS1 and CS2 levels appear to be of good quality and are delivered within short time frames. Even though the questions had clear cues to indicate that the student was trying to buy answers for a current assessed activity, the questions were neither identified nor flagged as violations of academic integrity anywhere in the process. We discuss potential measures that might counter contract cheating and conclude that a multi-pronged approach may be necessary for effective mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 98
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem? [J].
Amigud, Alexander ;
Dawson, Phillip .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (01) :98-108
[2]   246 reasons to cheat: An analysis of students' reasons for seeking to outsource academic work [J].
Amigud, Alexander ;
Lancaster, Thomas .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2019, 134 :98-107
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, P ACM C INN TECHN CO
[4]   Contract cheating in Australian higher education: a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities [J].
Bretag, Tracey ;
Harper, Rowena ;
Rundle, Kiata ;
Newton, Philip M. ;
Ellis, Cath ;
Saddiqui, Sonia ;
van Haeringen, Karen .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (01) :125-139
[5]   Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship [J].
Bretag, Tracey ;
Harper, Rowena ;
Burton, Michael ;
Ellis, Cath ;
Newton, Philip ;
van Haeringen, Karen ;
Saddiqui, Sonia ;
Rozenberg, Pearl .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (05) :676-691
[6]  
Clarke R., 2006, Eliminating the successor to plagiarism
[7]   How Prevalent is Contract Cheating and to What Extent are Students Repeat Offenders? [J].
Curtis G.J. ;
Clare J. .
Journal of Academic Ethics, 2017, 15 (2) :115-124
[8]   A legal approach to tackling contract cheating? [J].
Draper M.J. ;
Newton P.M. .
International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13 (1)
[9]   Jack Watson: Addressing Contract Cheating at Scale in Online Computer Science Education [J].
Graziano, Rocko ;
Benton, David ;
Wahal, Sarthak ;
Xue, Qiuyue ;
Miller, P. Tim ;
Larsen, Nick ;
Vacanti, Diego ;
Miller, Pepper ;
Mahajan, Khushhall Chandra ;
Srikanth, Deepak ;
Starner, Thad .
L@S '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH (2019) ACM CONFERENCE ON LEARNING @ SCALE, 2019,
[10]  
Grün B, 2009, J STAT SOFTW, V29, P1