A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shockwave Lithotripsy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteral Stones <2 cm: A Single Center Experience

被引:33
|
作者
Kumar, Anup [1 ,2 ]
Nanda, Biswajit
Kumar, Niraj
Kumar, Rohit
Vasudeva, Pawan
Mohanty, Nayan K.
机构
[1] Vardhman Mahaveer Med Coll, Dept Urol, New Delhi 110029, India
[2] Safdarjang Hosp, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; LASER LITHOTRIPSY; 2007; GUIDELINE; CALCULI; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; HOLMIUM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1089/end.2012.0493
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: The best management of upper ureteral calculi is undefined. We performed a prospective randomized comparison between semirigid ureteroscopy (URS) and shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for upper ureteral stones Patients and Methods: Patients with a single radiopaque upper ureteral stone <2 cm undergoing treatment between January 2010 and May 2011 in our department were included. Randomization was performed into two groups-group A: SWL performed as an outpatient procedure using an electromagnetic lithotripter (Dornier Compact Delta); group B: URS performed using an 6/7.5F semirigid ureteroscope with holmium laser intracorporeal lithotripsy. Statistical analysis was performed regarding demographic profile, success rates, retreatment rates, auxiliary procedures, and complications. Results: There were 90 patients enrolled in each group. Mean stone size: 12.3 mm in group A vs 12.5 mm in group B (P=0.52). The overall 3-month stone-free rate was (74/90) 82.2% for group A vs (78/90) 86.6% for group B (P=0.34). For stone size <10 mm, 3-month stone-free rates were (45/53) 84.9% for group A vs (43/49) 87.7% for group B (P=0.32). For 10 to 20 mm stones, 3-month stone-free rates were (29/37) 78.4% for group A vs (35/41) 85.4% for group B (P=0.12).The re-treatment rate was significantly greater in group A than group B (61.1% vs 1.1%, respectively; P<0.001). The auxiliary procedure rate was comparable in both groups (21.1% vs 17.7%; P=0.45). The complication rate was 6.6% in group A vs 11.1% in group B (P=0.21). Conclusions: Both SWL and semirigid URS are safe and highly efficacious for treating patients with proximal ureteral stones <20 mm. For stones <10 mm, SWL was safer, less invasive, and of comparable efficacy with URS. For stones between 10 and 20 mm, however, URS was more effective, with a lesser re-treatment rate.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 51
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the Trendelenburg position for extracting obstructive upper ureteral obstruction stones: a prospective, randomized, comparative trial
    Zhou, Rongsheng
    Han, Conghui
    Hao, Lin
    Chen, Bo
    Zang, Guanghui
    Fan, Tao
    Zhou, Jiahe
    Dong, Yang
    Ma, Weiming
    Pang, Kun
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 52 (04) : 291 - 295
  • [22] Comparison of treatment outcomes according to output voltage during shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized multicenter study
    Park, Jinsung
    Kim, Hong-Wook
    Hong, Sungwoo
    Yang, Hee Jo
    Chung, Hong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (05) : 609 - 615
  • [23] Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy under sedoanalgesia for treatment of kidney stones in infants: a single-center experience with 102 cases
    Adanur, Senol
    Ziypak, Tevfik
    Yilmaz, Ali Haydar
    Kocakgol, Huseyin
    Aksoy, Mehmet
    Yapanoglu, Turgut
    Polat, Ozkan
    Aksoy, Yilmaz
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 46 (11) : 2095 - 2101
  • [24] Comparison Between Retrograde and Antegrade Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy for the Management of Medium-Sized Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Randomized Prospective Study
    Abdel-Galeel, Ahmed M.
    Gawad, Ahmed M. Abdel
    Abouelgreed, Tamer A.
    Aboelsaad, Ahmed Y.
    Haggag, Yasser M.
    Abdelwadood, M.
    Fathi, Basem A.
    Elebiary, Mohamed F.
    Ahmed, Rasha
    Raouf, Ahmed G. Abdel
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [25] Randomized comparison of 4.5/6 Fr versus 6/7.5 Fr ureteroscopes for laser lithotripsy of lower/middle ureteral calculi: towards optimization of efficacy and safety of semirigid ureteroscopy
    Omar, Mohamed
    Dorrah, Mohammed
    Khalifa, Ahmed
    El Sherif, Eid
    Sayedahmed, Khalid
    Ghazwani, Yahya
    Noureldin, Yasser A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (12) : 3075 - 3081
  • [26] How to accelerate the upper urinary stone discharge after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for &lt; 15 mm upper urinary stones: a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial about external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL)
    Wu, Wenqi
    Yang, Zhou
    Tang, Fengling
    Xu, Changbao
    Wang, Youzhi
    Gu, Xiaojian
    Chen, Xuehua
    Wang, Rongjiang
    Yan, Jiaka
    Wang, Xiang
    Gao, Wenxi
    Hou, Chunhua
    Guo, Jianming
    Zhang, Jian
    Gurioli, Alberto
    Ye, Zhangqun
    Zeng, Guohua
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (02) : 293 - 298
  • [27] Randomized comparison of 4.5/6 Fr versus 6/7.5 Fr ureteroscopes for laser lithotripsy of lower/middle ureteral calculi: towards optimization of efficacy and safety of semirigid ureteroscopy
    Mohamed Omar
    Mohammed Dorrah
    Ahmed Khalifa
    Eid El Sherif
    Khalid Sayedahmed
    Yahya Ghazwani
    Yasser A. Noureldin
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 3075 - 3081
  • [28] Comparison of Fragmentation and Dusting Modality Using Holmium YAG Laser during Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Ureteral Stone: A Single-Center's Experience
    Chen, Bo-Han
    Lin, Tsu-Feng
    Tsai, Chih-Chun
    Chen, Marcelo
    Chiu, Allen W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (14)
  • [29] Efficacy of a percutaneous antegrade approach for the treatment of large upper ureteral stones: single-center experience
    Kara, Cengiz
    Resorlu, Berkan
    Bayindir, Mirze
    Unsal, Ali
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 37 (03): : 210 - 216
  • [30] Combined semirigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy via a large ureteral access sheath for kidney stones &gt;2 cm: a bicentric prospective assessment
    Miernik, Arkadiusz
    Schoenthaler, Martin
    Wilhelm, Konrad
    Wetterauer, Ulrich
    Zyczkowski, Marcin
    Paradysz, Andrzej
    Bryniarski, Piotr
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (03) : 697 - 702