Sentinel lymph node mapping for thick (≥4-mm) melanoma:: Should we be doing it?

被引:70
作者
Carlson, GW
Murray, DR
Hestley, A
Staley, CA
Lyles, RH
Cohen, C
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
sentinel lymph node; thick melanoma; prognostic factors; distant metastasis;
D O I
10.1245/ASO.2003.03.055
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Thick (greater than or equal to4-mm) primary melanomas are believed to be associated with a high incidence of occult distant metastases. The use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and biopsy in the treatment lesions has been questioned. Methods: A retrospective review of a computerized database identified 114 patients who underwent successful SLN mapping and biopsy from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 1999. Records were reviewed for clinicopathologic features of the patients and their tumors. Survival curves were constructed from Kaplan-Meier estimates and analyzed with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: There were 75 men and 39 women with a mean age of 57 years (range, 24-85 years). The primary tumor sites were head and neck (n = 29; 25.4%), trunk (n = 44; 38.6%), and extremities (n = 41; 36%). Tumor thickness ranged from 4 to 17 mm (median, 5.2 mm; mean, 6.3 mm). Ulceration was present in 40 (35.1%) tumors. Thirty-seven patients (32.5%) had a positive SLN biopsy, and 18 of these patients (48.6%) had a single tumor-positive lymph node after dissection. The mean follow-up was 37.8 months. The overall 3-year survival for SLN-negative patients was 82%, versus 57% for SLN-positive patients (P = .006). Lymph node status and tumor ulceration were independent predictors of overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Conclusions: The pathologic status of the SLN in patients with thick melanomas is a strong independent prognostic factor for survival, and SLN mapping should be routinely performed.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 415
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Meta-analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity in Thin Melanoma (≤1 mm) [J].
Warycha, Melanie A. ;
Zakrzewski, Jan ;
Ni, Quanhong ;
Shapiro, Richard L. ;
Berman, Russell S. ;
Pavlick, Anna C. ;
Polsky, David ;
Mazumdar, Madhu ;
Osman, Iman .
CANCER, 2009, 115 (04) :869-879
[22]   Should all melanoma patients undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy? [J].
Ra, JH ;
McMasters, KM ;
Spitz, FR .
CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2006, 18 (02) :185-188
[23]   Melanoma Staging and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy [J].
Forsea, Ana-Maria .
ACTA DERMATOVENEROLOGICA CROATICA, 2010, 18 (04) :279-288
[24]   Sentinel lymph node mapping and selective lymphadenectomy: The standard of care for melanoma [J].
Leong S.P.L. .
Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2004, 5 (3) :185-194
[25]   The role of sentinel lymph node mapping in lower genital tract melanoma [J].
Lopez, Salvatore ;
Guerrisi, Rocco ;
Brusadelli, Claudia ;
Bogani, Giorgio ;
Ditto, Antonino ;
Raspagliesi, Francesco .
MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2020, 72 (06) :384-390
[26]   Cutaneous melanoma and sentinel lymph node biopsy: where are we today? [J].
Girod, Angelique ;
Salmon, Remy ;
Rodriguez, Jose .
BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2007, 94 (7-8) :687-691
[27]   Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Melanoma in the Twenty-first Century [J].
Doepker, Matthew P. ;
Zager, Jonathan S. .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 24 (02) :249-+
[28]   Methods of sentinel lymph node mapping [Zur methodik des sentinel lymph node mapping] [J].
Kitagawa Y. ;
Burian M. ;
Kitajima M. .
Der Chirurg, 2004, 75 (8) :751-755
[29]   Where Are We Going with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Gynecologic Cancers? [J].
C. Reneé Franklin ;
Edward J. Tanner .
Current Oncology Reports, 2018, 20
[30]   Where Are We Going with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Gynecologic Cancers? [J].
Franklin, C. Renee ;
Tanner, Edward J., III .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 20 (12)