Do Socio-Economic Characteristics Affect Travel Behavior? A Comparative Study of Low-Carbon and Non-Low-Carbon Shopping Travel in Shenyang City, China

被引:28
作者
Li, Jing [1 ]
Lo, Kevin [2 ]
Guo, Meng [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Northeast Inst Geog & Agroecol, Changchun 130102, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Geog, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Northeast Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Changchun 130024, Jilin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
travel behavior; socio-economic characteristics; shopping mobility; influencing factors; China; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DIOXIDE CO2 EMISSIONS; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; MODE CHOICE; NEIGHBORHOOD TYPE; URBAN FORM; ENERGY; MOBILITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph15071346
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Choices regarding mode of travel have an evident effect on environment pollutants and public health. This paper makes a significant contribution by examining the differences between low-carbon and non-low-carbon travel mode choices during shopping trips, and how socio-economic characteristics impact individual travel behavior based on data gathered from a questionnaire conducted in Shenyang, China. The study found that, firstly, low-carbon travel modes were more common than non-low-carbon travel modes for shopping, and the average travel distance by non-low-carbon modes was a little longer than that of low-carbon modes. Secondly, suburban and wholesale specialized commercial centers attracted more residents travelling longer distances by non-low carbon modes, especially private car, compared to regional commercial centers in inner city areas. Thirdly, strong relationships between car ownership, gender, monthly income, and travel mode choices were identified in a binary logistic regression model. This study thus highlights the importance of sustainable transportation policies to advocate low-carbon travel modes and reduce carbon emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Urban form, commuting patterns and CO2 emissions: What differences between the municipality's residents and its jobs? [J].
Aguilera, Anne ;
Voisin, Marion .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2014, 69 :243-251
[2]   Employment suburbanisation, reverse commuting and travel behaviour by residents of the central city in the Paris metropolitan area [J].
Aguilera, Anne ;
Wenglenski, Sandrine ;
Proulhac, Laurent .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2009, 43 (07) :685-691
[3]   Carbon emissions and oil consumption in Saudi Arabia [J].
Alkhathlan, Khalid ;
Javid, Muhammad .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 48 :105-111
[4]  
Andong R. F., 2015, ENV DEV SUSTAIN, V19, P1
[5]   The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: A structural equations modeling approach [J].
Bagley, MN ;
Mokhtarian, PL .
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2002, 36 (02) :279-297
[6]   Cities, mobility and climate change [J].
Banister, David .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 19 (06) :1538-1546
[7]   Affective-symbolic and instrumental-independence psychological motives mediating effects of socio-demographic variables on daily car use [J].
Bergstad, Cecilia Jakobsson ;
Gamble, Amelie ;
Hagman, Olle ;
Polk, Merritt ;
Garling, Tommy ;
Olsson, Lars E. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 19 (01) :33-38
[8]   A joint count-continuous model of travel behavior with selection based on a multinomial probit residential density choice model [J].
Bhat, Chandra R. ;
Astroza, Sebastian ;
Sidharthan, Raghuprasad ;
Bin Alamd, Mohammad Jobair ;
Khushefati, Waleed H. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2014, 68 :31-51
[9]   Level of service delivery of public transport and mode choice in Accra, Ghana [J].
Birago, Dora ;
Mensah, Seth Opoku ;
Sharma, Somesh .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 46 :284-300
[10]   Urban transport scenarios in South Asia - Energy and environmental impact of enhanced public transport systems [J].
Bose, Ranjan Kumar .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2007, 2011 (2011) :116-126