Analysis on the innovation efficiency of China's electronic and communication equipment industry

被引:6
作者
Wang, Yu [1 ]
Li, Junwei [2 ]
Zhong, Shen [2 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Univ Commerce, Sch Accounting, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Univ Commerce, Sch Finance, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Electronic and communication equipment; industry; Innovation efficiency; Global-Malmquist index; Meta-frontier; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; OFFSHORE WIND; POLICY MIX; PERFORMANCE; GROWTH; IMPACT; SPILLOVERS; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrras.2022.01.012
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The development of electronic and communication equipment industry is the driving force of economic growth, and innovation is the basic motivation for the development of electronic and communication equipment industry. The evaluation of innovation efficiency of electronic and communication equipment industry (IEEC) is conducive to economic growth and better development of electronic and communication equipment manufacturing industry. The existing researches mainly focus on the efficiency evaluation of high-tech industry, and there is few study on the IEEC. To fill the gap, based on DDF model and Global-Malmquist index, this paper estimates the IEEC in 20 provinces of China from 2009 to 2018. The results show that: (1) From the perspective of time dimension, China's IEEC shows an overall growth trend in the past decade from 2009 to 2018. (2) From the regional perspective, IEEC exists differences among regions. Under the meta-frontier and group frontier, the value of IEEC in the central region is higher than the value of IEEC in the eastern region and western region. (3) From the decomposition index, the growth of IEEC depends more on technological progress, rather than efficiency improvement. Combined with the above conclusions, some policy implications are proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 121
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[21]   Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? [J].
Hagedoorn, J ;
Cloodt, M .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (08) :1365-1379
[22]  
Hayami Y., 1973, J. Econ. History, V33, P484
[23]  
Hemmert M, 2004, J ENG TECHNOL MANAGE, V21, P149, DOI [10.1016/j.jengtecman.2004.05.004, 10.1016/j.jengteeman.2004.05.004]
[24]   The impact of R&D spillovers on UK manufacturing TFP:: A dynamic panel approach [J].
Higon, Dolores Anon .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (07) :964-979
[25]   Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China's high-tech industries? [J].
Hong, Jin ;
Feng, Bing ;
Wu, Yanrui ;
Wang, Liangbing .
TECHNOVATION, 2016, 57-58 :4-13
[26]   Korean and Taiwanese productivity performance: Comparisons at matched manufacturing levels [J].
Hsiao, FST ;
Park, C .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2005, 23 (01) :85-107
[27]   A decomposition of total factor productivity growth in Korean manufacturing industries: A stochastic frontier approach [J].
Kim, S ;
Han, G .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2001, 16 (03) :269-281
[28]   A decomposition of total productivity growth A regional analysis of Indian industrial manufacturing growth [J].
Kumar, Surender .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2006, 55 (3-4) :311-331
[29]   Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach [J].
Lee, Hakyeon ;
Park, Yongtae ;
Choi, Hoogon .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 196 (03) :847-855
[30]  
Li J., 2013, J CHINESE ENTREPRENE, V5, P94, DOI [10.1108/ 17561391311297905, DOI 10.1108/17561391311297905]