Analysis on the innovation efficiency of China's electronic and communication equipment industry

被引:6
作者
Wang, Yu [1 ]
Li, Junwei [2 ]
Zhong, Shen [2 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Univ Commerce, Sch Accounting, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Univ Commerce, Sch Finance, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Electronic and communication equipment; industry; Innovation efficiency; Global-Malmquist index; Meta-frontier; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; OFFSHORE WIND; POLICY MIX; PERFORMANCE; GROWTH; IMPACT; SPILLOVERS; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrras.2022.01.012
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The development of electronic and communication equipment industry is the driving force of economic growth, and innovation is the basic motivation for the development of electronic and communication equipment industry. The evaluation of innovation efficiency of electronic and communication equipment industry (IEEC) is conducive to economic growth and better development of electronic and communication equipment manufacturing industry. The existing researches mainly focus on the efficiency evaluation of high-tech industry, and there is few study on the IEEC. To fill the gap, based on DDF model and Global-Malmquist index, this paper estimates the IEEC in 20 provinces of China from 2009 to 2018. The results show that: (1) From the perspective of time dimension, China's IEEC shows an overall growth trend in the past decade from 2009 to 2018. (2) From the regional perspective, IEEC exists differences among regions. Under the meta-frontier and group frontier, the value of IEEC in the central region is higher than the value of IEEC in the eastern region and western region. (3) From the decomposition index, the growth of IEEC depends more on technological progress, rather than efficiency improvement. Combined with the above conclusions, some policy implications are proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 121
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1973, J ECON HIST, DOI DOI 10.1017/S002205070007683X
[2]   A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies [J].
Battese, GE ;
Rao, DSP ;
O'Donnell, CJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (01) :91-103
[3]   Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency [J].
Chambers, RG ;
Chung, Y ;
Fare, R .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1998, 98 (02) :351-364
[4]   A comparative performance evaluation of Taiwan's high-tech industries [J].
Chen, Chung-Jen ;
Yeh, Quey-Jen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2005, 7 (01) :16-33
[5]  
Chen H, 2017, J INTERDISCIP MATH, V20, P1493, DOI 10.1080/09720502.2017.1382194
[6]   Efficiency and technology gap in China's agriculture: A regional meta-frontier analysis [J].
Chen, Zhuo ;
Song, Shunfeng .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 19 (02) :287-296
[7]  
Clausen Tommy H., 2009, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, V20, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2009.09.004
[8]   The impact of high-tech capital on productivity: Evidence from Australia [J].
Connolly, E ;
Fox, KJ .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2006, 44 (01) :50-68
[9]   Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies [J].
Costantini, Valeria ;
Crespi, Francesco ;
Palma, Alessandro .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (04) :799-819
[10]   Efficiency, R&D and ownership - some empirical evidence [J].
Dilling-Hansen, M ;
Madsen, ES ;
Smith, V .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2003, 83 (01) :85-94