Impact of hydrogen electrolyzers on flexibility and network voltage profiles of a virtual power plant

被引:0
作者
De Corato, Antonella Maria [1 ]
Riaz, Shariq [1 ]
Mancarella, Pierluigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
2020 AUSTRALASIAN UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (AUPEC) | 2020年
关键词
Electrolyzer; feasible operating envelopes; flexibility; Monte Carlo simulation; Virtual Power Plant; TO-GAS; WATER ELECTROLYSIS; STORAGE; SYSTEM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Additional flexibility to accommodate the increasing share of intermittent Renewable Energy Sources (RES) is essential to guarantee reliable and stable operation of low-carbon power systems. The concept of virtual power plant (VPP) is central to the aggregation and coordinated control of heterogeneous Distributed Energy Resources (DER), as VPPs can offer aggregated DER capacity in various markets for the provision of energy and grid support services. Among emerging technologies, electrolyzers for hydrogen production could provide system support services and thus be integrated in a VPP framework as an additional source of flexibility. To do so, this paper first introduces, for PEM and alkaline electrolyzer technologies, their active and reactive (P-Q) power "feasibility charts" based on their underlying physical characteristics. These are then used within a broader VPP- based DER aggregation setup to describe its P-Q capability chart, also referred to as feasible operating envelope (FOE), while also considering relevant distribution network constraints, and studying the impact of electrolyzer location and operation on voltage profiles. Simulation results show how integrating electrolyzers into VPP schemes could potentially greatly expand their FOE, thereby opening up new opportunities for distributed hydrogen technologies to actively provide operational flexibility at scale.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, DEV BUS CAS FUEL CEL
[2]   NETWORK RECONFIGURATION IN DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS FOR LOSS REDUCTION AND LOAD BALANCING [J].
BARAN, ME ;
WU, FF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 1989, 4 (02) :1401-1407
[3]   Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review [J].
Buttler, Alexander ;
Spliethoff, Hartmut .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 :2440-2454
[4]   Storing renewables in the gas network: modelling of power-to-gas seasonal storage flexibility in low-carbon power systems [J].
Clegg, Stephen ;
Mancarella, Pierluigi .
IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2016, 10 (03) :566-575
[5]   Integrated Modeling and Assessment of the Operational Impact of Power-to-Gas (P2G) on Electrical and Gas Transmission Networks [J].
Clegg, Stephen ;
Mancarella, Pierluigi .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2015, 6 (04) :1234-1244
[6]   Impact of hydrogen energy storage on California electric power system: Towards 100% renewable electricity [J].
Colbertaldo, Paolo ;
Agustin, Stacey Britni ;
Campanari, Stefano ;
Brouwer, Jack .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (19) :9558-9576
[7]   Modelling the integrated power and transport energy system: The role of power-to-gas and hydrogen in long-term scenarios for Italy [J].
Colbertaldo, Paolo ;
Guandalini, Giulio ;
Campanari, Stefano .
ENERGY, 2018, 154 :592-601
[8]  
NREL, 2014, PROV MOR JUST HYDR
[9]   Virtual power plant and system integration of distributed energy resources [J].
Pudjianto, D. ;
Ramsay, C. ;
Strbac, G. .
IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2007, 1 (01) :10-16
[10]  
Riaz S, 2019, 2019 IEEE MILAN POWERTECH