Comparison of higher dose and lower dose ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in seropositive heart transplant recipients

被引:7
作者
Lee, S. -O. [2 ]
Rim, J. H. [1 ]
Sung, H. [3 ]
Kim, S. -H. [2 ]
Choi, S. -H. [2 ]
Lee, C. W. [1 ]
Yun, T. J. [4 ]
Lee, J. -W. [4 ]
Woo, J. H. [2 ]
Kim, Y. S. [2 ]
Kim, J. -J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Infect Dis, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Lab Med, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Thorac Surg, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
cytomegalovirus; ganciclovir; prophylaxis; heart transplantation; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS; PREEMPTIVE THERAPY; CLINICAL-FEATURES; ANTIGENEMIA ASSAY; PP65; ANTIGENEMIA; CONTROLLED TRIAL; DISEASE; REJECTION; RETINITIS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-3062.2009.00450.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. We performed a retrospective historical cohort study to compare the efficacy of higher dose (HD, 10 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks, followed by 5 mg/kg/day intravenously for 2 weeks) and lower dose (LD, 5 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks) ganciclovir (GCV) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in seropositive heart transplant recipients. Methods. All consecutive patients undergoing heart transplantation (HT) between June 1999 and January 2008 at our institution were enrolled. All recipients were seropositive for CMV before HT. Before October 2005, 72 patients received the HD regimen and after October 2005, 36 patients received the LD regimen. We followed up all patients for 1 year. Results. In the HD group 43 of 72 patients (60%) developed CMV infections vs. 21 of 36 patients (58%) in the LD group (P = 0.89). CMV diseases occurred in 4 patients of the HD group (6%) and 4 patients of the LD group (11%) (P = 0.44). The incidence of acute rejection was not significantly different between the 2 groups (14% vs. 6%; P = 0.33). Among patients who completed 4-week courses of prophylaxis, 32 of 58 patients (55%) in the HD group developed CMV infections vs. 18 of 30 patients (60%) in the LD group (P = 0.66). CMV diseases occurred in 3 patients of the HD group (5%) and 4 of the LD group (13%) (P = 0.22). Acute rejection incidence did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (17% vs. 7%; P = 0.21). Conclusions. LD GCV for CMV prophylaxis may not be inferior to the HD regimen in seropositive HT recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 37
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-Dose Acyclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Seropositive Abdominal Transplant Recipients
    Jorgenson, Margaret R.
    Descourouez, Jillian L.
    Leverson, Glen E.
    McCreary, Erin K.
    Lucey, Michael R.
    Smith, Jeannina A.
    Redfield, Robert R.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2018, 52 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [2] Intravenous ganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus in heart, heart-lung, and lung transplant recipients
    Wreghitt, TG
    Abel, SJC
    McNeil, K
    Parameshwar, J
    Stewart, S
    Cary, N
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 12 (04) : 254 - 260
  • [3] Low-dose valganciclovir prohylaxis is efficacious and safe in cytomegalovirus seropositive heart transplant recipients with anti-thymocyte globulin
    Eriksson, Mari
    Jokinen, Janne J.
    Soderlund, Sanni
    Hammainen, Pekka
    Lommi, Jyri
    Lemstrom, Karl
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2018, 20 (03)
  • [4] Impact of targeted oral ganciclovir prophylaxis for transplant recipients of livers from cytomegalovirus-seropositive donors
    Shah, T
    Lai, WK
    Mutimer, D
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2005, 7 (02) : 57 - 62
  • [5] Low-Dose Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Heart Transplant Recipients
    Julian, K. G.
    Shattahi, E.
    Burg, J. E.
    Boehmer, J. P.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 45 (09) : 3414 - 3417
  • [6] Incidence and severity of cytomegalovirus infection in seropositive heart transplant recipients
    Gardiner, Bradley J.
    Bailey, Jessica P.
    Percival, Mia A.
    Morgan, Beth A.
    Warner, Victoria M.
    Lee, Sue J.
    Morrissey, C. Orla
    Kaye, David M.
    Peleg, Anton Y.
    Taylor, Andrew J.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 37 (06)
  • [7] Outcome of low-dose ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus disease prophylaxis in renal-transplant recipients
    Ahmed, J
    Velarde, C
    Ramos, M
    Ismail, K
    Serpa, J
    Ortigosa-Goggins, M
    Parasuraman, R
    Venkat, KK
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (11) : 1689 - 1692
  • [8] The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in lung transplant recipients under universal prophylaxis with intravenous ganciclovir
    Schroeeder, Regina
    Michelon, Tatiana
    Wurdig, Joao
    Fagundes, Iara
    Schio, Sadi
    Sanchez, Leticia
    Camargo, Jose J.
    Sukkienik, Teresa C.
    Pasqualotto, Alessandro C.
    Neumann, Jorge
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 11 (02) : 212 - 214
  • [9] Comparison of universal prophylaxis and preemptive treatment with valganciclovir in management of cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant recipients
    Vymetalova, Jevgenija
    Kubanek, Milos
    Gazdic, Tomas
    Vrbska, Jana
    Malek, Ivan
    Kautzner, Josef
    COR ET VASA, 2012, 54 (01) : E16 - E21
  • [10] Oral ganciclovir versus valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk liver transplant recipients
    Brady, R. L.
    Green, K.
    Frei, C.
    Maxwell, P.
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2009, 11 (02) : 106 - 111