Indoor air quality management based on fuzzy risk assessment and its case study

被引:26
作者
Yuan, Jing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Zhi [2 ]
Zhong, Lexuan [3 ]
Wang, Baozhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangtze Normal Univ, Green Intelligence Environm Sch, Chongqing 408100, Peoples R China
[2] Concordia Univ, Dept Bldg Civil & Environm Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
关键词
Fuzzy synthetic model; Indoor air quality (IAQ); Risk assessment; Management; THERMAL COMFORT; ENVIRONMENT; HEALTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2019.101654
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A fuzzy synthetic model combined with risk scores contour was developed for indoor air quality (IAQ) assessment and management of office building. This research makes up for the shortcomings of previous methods for IAQ assessment, describing a modeling study that estimates baseline health impacts associated with physical comfort and biological impacts with risk scores contour for indoor air quality. In details, this model is used to establish a set of chemicals, physical and biological air pollution factors related to evaluation criteria, which can comprehensively evaluate the impact of various co-existing pollutants (such as formaldehyde and TVOC) on the indoor environment. The practicability and performance of the method are tested by taking the indoor air quality of a standard office building in Shanghai as an example. The results indicate that Room 1013 shows the poorest score in terms of pollution impact and comfort level. The results show that fuzzy comprehensive evaluation can solve the problem of ambiguity, inconsistency, and lack of discrimination of air pollutants in buildings. This approach also provides flexibility and technical details for indoor air quality management. This method helps to monitor air pollutants more effectively and apply to building design to ensure acceptable indoor air quality.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Importance of Operational Efficiency to Achieve Energy Efficiency and Exhaust Emission Reduction of Construction Operations
    Ahn, Changbum R.
    Lee, SangHyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (04) : 404 - 413
  • [2] Al horr Yousef, 2016, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, V5, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.006
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1985, INT J APPROXIMATE RE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1988, Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process
  • [5] Backman H, 1999, J Am Optom Assoc, V70, P309
  • [6] Beliakov G., 2007, Aggregation functions: a guide for practitioners, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-73721-6
  • [7] A study on the comprehensive indicator of indoor environment assessment for occupants' health in Taiwan
    Chiang, CM
    Lai, CM
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 37 (04) : 387 - 392
  • [8] *CHIN EPA, 2002, 188832002 GBT CHIN E
  • [9] Survey of mathematical programming models in air pollution management
    Cooper, WW
    Hemphill, H
    Huang, Z
    Li, S
    Lelas, V
    Sullivan, DW
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 96 (01) : 1 - 35
  • [10] Uncertainty, ensembles and air quality dispersion modeling: applications and challenges
    Dabberdt, WF
    Miller, E
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 34 (27) : 4667 - 4673