Effects of varying numbers of Likert scale points on factor structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

被引:29
作者
Xu, Meng Lin [1 ]
Leung, Shing On [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Macau, Taipa, Macao, Peoples R China
关键词
composite reliability; external validity; latent mean differences; Likert scale; measurement invariance; self-esteem; GOODNESS-OF-FIT; RESPONSE CATEGORIES; RATING-SCALES; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; RELIABILITY; EQUIVALENCE; 4-POINT; INDEXES; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/ajsp.12214
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Likert-type rating scales are among the most widely used tools in psychological research. Different numbers of response categories would likely affect response style, data distribution, reliability, and construct validity. There is a lack of research in factor structure invariance under Likert scales with different numbers of categories. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of varying numbers of Likert points (4-11) on scale properties such as factor structure, external validity, and latent means based on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (M. Rosenberg, 1989). The sample consists of 1,807 students from secondary schools in Macau. Confirmatory factor analysis shows that the correlated two-factor model is the most appropriate one; longitudinal invariance analysis reveals that measurement invariance across Likert scales was satisfied at the scalar level. In addition, latent mean scores on the two factors as well as observed means on the subscales are comparable across Likert scales. Moreover, the measurement model across Likert scales exhibit similar external validity. Although psychometric properties are mostly similar among a different number of points, the 4-point Likert scale is not recommended for its higher skewness and lower loadings; the 11-point Liken scale from 0 to 10 is slightly preferred for its higher loadings and composite reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 128
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Measuring the Mathematical Attitudes of Elementary Students: The Effects of a 4-Point or 5-Point Likert-Type Scale [J].
Adelson, Jill L. ;
McCoach, D. Betsy .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2010, 70 (05) :796-807
[2]  
Alwin DuaneF., 1992, Sociological Methodology, V22, P83, DOI DOI 10.2307/270993
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, DOI DOI 10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73
[4]   The factor structure and composite reliability of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among ex-prisoners [J].
Boduszek, Daniel ;
Hyland, Philip ;
Dhingra, Katie ;
Mallett, John .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2013, 55 (08) :877-881
[5]  
Brown T. A., 2014, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[6]  
CHANG L, 1994, APPL PSYCH MEAS, V18, P205
[7]   Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance [J].
Chen, Fang Fang .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) :464-504
[8]   AN ERROR IN THE USE OF TRANSLATED SCALES - THE ROSENBERG SELF-ESTEEM SCALE FOR CHINESE [J].
CHENG, ST ;
HAMID, PN .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1995, 81 (02) :431-434
[9]   Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model [J].
Cummins, RA .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2003, 64 (02) :225-256
[10]  
Cummins RA., 2000, P 2 INT C QUALITY LI, P74