Is chorionic villus sampling associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy?

被引:16
作者
Odibo, Anthony O. [1 ]
Singla, Ashima [1 ]
Gray, Diana L. [1 ]
Dicke, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
Oberle, Barbara [1 ]
Crane, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med Ultrasound & Genet, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
fetal therapy; genetic counseling; chorionic villas sampling; hypertensive disorders; preeclampsia; fetal and placental pathology; FETAL LOSS;
D O I
10.1002/pd.2410
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective Our objective is to evaluate for potential associations between chorionic villas sampling (CVS) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Methods Using our genetic database, we compared the rates of hypertensive disorders between women who underwent CVS at 10-13 and 6/7 weeks with those seen for other indications at similar gestational ages who had no invasive procedure. Only singleton and euploid pregnancies were included. Statistical methods including univariable and multivariable logistic regression, Supplemented by stratified analyses were used for comparisons. Results Among 11012 pregnant women seen between 1990 and 2006 in our center and meeting the inclusion criteria, information on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were available in 9386, and 9098 met the inclusion criteria. The overall incidence of hypertensive disorders was 421/9098 (4.6%), with 138/5096 (2.7%) in the CVS group and 283/4002 (7.1%) in the control group [adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38-0.59]. Similar findings were seen on stratified analyses for gestational age of procedure and the type or severity of hypertensive disorder, and other potential confounders. Conclusion The rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is significantly lower in women having CVS compared with the control group. Placental disruption from CVS is not associated with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 13
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
ADUSUMALLI J, 2007, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2002, ACOG PRACT B, V33
[3]   Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss [J].
Caughey, Aaron B. ;
Hopkins, Linda M. ;
Norton, Mary E. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (03) :612-616
[4]   Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy [J].
Gifford, RW ;
August, PA ;
Cunningham, G ;
Green, LA ;
Lindheimer, MD ;
McNellis, D ;
Roberts, JM ;
Sibai, BM ;
Taler, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (01) :S1-S22
[5]  
Gindler J. S., 1995, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V44, P1
[6]   The association between chorionic villus sampling and preeclampsia [J].
Grobman, William A. ;
Auger, Melissa ;
Shulman, Lee P. ;
Elias, Sherman .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2009, 29 (08) :800-803
[7]   A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TRANSCERVICAL AND TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC-VILLUS SAMPLING [J].
JACKSON, LG ;
ZACHARY, JM ;
FOWLER, SE ;
DESNICK, RJ ;
GOLBUS, MS ;
LEDBETTER, DH ;
MAHONEY, MJ ;
PERGAMENT, E ;
SIMPSON, JL ;
BLACK, S ;
WAPNER, RJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (09) :594-598
[8]   Evaluating the rate and risk factors for fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling [J].
Odibo, Anthony O. ;
Dicke, Jeffrey M. ;
Gray, Diana L. ;
Oberle, Barbara ;
Stamilio, David M. ;
Macones, George A. ;
Crane, James P. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (04) :813-819
[9]   Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis [J].
Odibo, Anthony O. ;
Gray, Diane L. ;
Dicke, Amjejftey M. ;
Stamilio, David M. ;
Macones, George A. ;
Crane, James P. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :589-595
[10]   Late first-trimester placental disruption and subsequent gestational hypertension/preeclampsia [J].
Silver, RK ;
Wilson, RD ;
Philip, M ;
Thom, EA ;
Zachary, JM ;
Mohide, P ;
Mahoney, M ;
Simpson, ML ;
Platt, LD ;
Pergament, E ;
Hershey, D ;
Filkins, K ;
Johnson, A ;
Wapner, RJ ;
Jackson, LG .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (03) :587-592