Comparative evaluation of the antifungal susceptibility of Candida isolates from blood specimens: results of a study in a tertiary care hospital in Bursa, Turkey

被引:3
作者
Evci, Canan [1 ]
Ener, Beyza [1 ]
Goral, Gueher [1 ]
Akcaglar, Sevim [1 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Dept Microbiol, Fac Med, TR-16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
关键词
Candida species; antifungal susceptibility tests; ANTIMICROBIAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; AMPHOTERICIN-B; BROTH MICRODILUTION; NATIONAL-COMMITTEE; STREAM INFECTIONS; ETEST METHOD; FLUCONAZOLE; VORICONAZOLE; TRENDS; MACRODILUTION;
D O I
10.3906/sag-0808-14
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: Antifungal susceptibility testing may be an important aid in the treatment of patients with life threatening yeast infections. The aim of this study was to determine the susceptibility of Candida isolates obtained from clinical specimens to the antifungal agents amphotericin B and fluconazole, which are frequently used in our clinical practice. Materials and methods: Susceptibility to antifungal agents was investigated using the Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) and the reference broth macrodilution susceptibility test (CLSI M27-A2). The MICs obtained with each of the methods were read after 24 h and 48 h of incubation. Results: Overall agreement rates within +/- 1 dilution between the 2 methods were 86.7% (24 h) and 94.1% (48 h) for amphotericin B, and 85.5% (24 h) and 73.3% (48 h) for fluconazole. All C. albicans, C. pelliculosa, C. glabrata, and C. kefyr isolates were inhibited by <= 1 mu g mL-1 of amphotericin B, and fluconazole resistance was not observed in C. albicans or C. tropicalis isolates according to the 2 methods. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, decreased susceptibility to fluconazole and amphotericin B was most prominent in C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, and C. glabrata isolates.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 149
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
*AB BIODISK, 2007, E TEST TECHN GUID 4
[2]   Comparison of Etest and a tablet diffusion test with the NCCLS broth microdilution method for fluconazole and amphotericin B susceptibility testing of Candida isolates [J].
Arendrup, M ;
Lundgren, B ;
Jensen, IM ;
Hansen, BS ;
Frimodt-Moller, N .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 47 (05) :521-526
[3]   Increasing incidence of candidemia:: Results from a 20-year nationwide study in Iceland [J].
Asmundsdóttir, LR ;
Erlendsdóttir, H ;
Gottfredsson, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (09) :3489-3492
[4]   Trends in antifungal susceptibility among Swedish Candida species bloodstream isolates from 1994 to 1998:: Comparison of the E-test and the Sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal Panel with the NCCLS M27-A reference method [J].
Chryssanthou, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (11) :4181-4183
[5]   Interlaboratory evaluation of Etest method for testing antifungal susceptibilities of pathogenic yeasts to five antifungal agents by using Casitone agar and solidified RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose [J].
EspinelIngroff, A ;
Pfaller, M ;
Erwin, ME ;
Jones, RN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (04) :848-852
[6]   Candida glabrata:: Review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C-albicans [J].
Fidel, PL ;
Vazquez, JA ;
Sobel, JD .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1999, 12 (01) :80-+
[7]  
GOLDMAN M, 1993, MEDICINE, V72, P143, DOI 10.1097/00005792-199372030-00002
[8]  
HADFIELD TL, 1987, REV INFECT DIS, V9, P1006
[9]  
Lunel FMV, 1999, DIAGN MICR INFEC DIS, V34, P213
[10]   The trailing end point phenotype in antifungal susceptibility testing is pH dependent [J].
Marr, KA ;
Rustad, TR ;
Rex, JH ;
White, TC .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 43 (06) :1383-1386