A model for selecting appropriate technology for incubator-university collaboration by considering the technology transfer mechanism

被引:16
作者
Wulung, R. B. Seno [1 ]
Takahashi, Katsuhiko [2 ]
Morikawa, Katsumi [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Ind Republ Indonesia, Politekn ATK, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Syst Cybernet, Higashihiroshima, Japan
关键词
technology incubator; technology selection; technology transfer; profit-sharing; technology obsolescence; BUSINESS INCUBATORS; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2017.1374569
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A technology incubator provides an important support for a technology transfer mechanism. A technology incubator bridges the incubatees to the technology provider. In our research, we propose a technology selection model for the incubatees. Incubator managers, as decision-makers, attempt to evaluate new technology for the incubatees by comparing its profit with that of the old or established technology. The technology is proposed by a technology provider, which in this case is a university. In the technology selection activity, the distance between the technology level of incubatees and transferred technology should be considered. Unfortunately, there has been no effort to formulate a technology selection model in the technology incubator that considers the technology distance and is linked to the incubatees' profit as financial performance. We examine the impact of the technological-level and technology assimilation rate in the technology selection process in the technology incubator. We analyse the external factor of customer acceptance of new technology with a probabilistic value and technology obsolescence. Furthermore, we introduce a profit-sharing scheme to share the profit of the incubatees with the university as a technology provider. Utilising a profit-sharing scheme means sharing the risk between incubatees and the university.
引用
收藏
页码:2309 / 2321
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Incubators: Tool for entrepreneurship? [J].
Aernoudt, R .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2004, 23 (02) :127-135
[2]   Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators [J].
Aerts, Kris ;
Matthyssens, Paul ;
Vandenbempt, Koen .
TECHNOVATION, 2007, 27 (05) :254-267
[3]   An improved MCDM DEA model for technology selection [J].
Amin, Gholam R. ;
Toloo, M. ;
Sohrabi, B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2006, 44 (13) :2681-2686
[4]   Incubator best practice: A framework [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Norrman, Charlotte .
TECHNOVATION, 2008, 28 (1-2) :20-28
[5]   Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory [J].
Bozeman, B .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (4-5) :627-655
[6]   Assessing technology incubator programs in the science park: the good, the bad and the ugly [J].
Chan, KF ;
Lau, T .
TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (10) :1215-1228
[7]  
CHAU SC, 2016, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECA, P1
[8]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[9]   A profit sharing scheme for a two-firm joint venture [J].
Du, L ;
Hu, QY ;
Liu, LM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 170 (01) :277-292
[10]   Industrial leadership in science-based industries: A co-evolution model [J].
Fatas-Villafranca, Francisco ;
Jarne, Gloria ;
Sanchez-Choliz, Julio .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2009, 72 (01) :390-407