A randomized phase 3 study of intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy

被引:52
作者
Klotz, L [1 ]
Heaton, J
Jewett, M
Chin, J
Fleshner, N
Goldenberg, L
Gleave, M
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Urol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Div Urol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Prostate Ctr, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; impotence;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67031-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determine if mapping of the cavernous nerve during radical prostatectomy using intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with tumescence monitoring results in improved erectile potency compared to conventional nerve sparing. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized, single blinded study was performed on 61 patients at 6 centers. Patients had elected to undergo nerve sparing prostatectomy and had normal preoperative erectile function documented by the Sexual Function Inventory Questionnaire (SFIQ) and RigiScan parallel to testing. Patients were randomized between conventional nerve sparing and nerve sparing assisted by the CaverMap Surgical Aid. In all patients neural continuity was assessed immediately after prostate removal by proximal cavernous nerve stimulation. All patients were blinded according to their allocation cohort. Results: At 1 year there was substantial improvement in erectile function in the CaverMap group as measured by RigiScan. This group had a mean of 15.9 minutes of greater than 60% nocturnal tumescence compared to 2.1 minutes in the conventional nerve sparing group (p <0.024). By SFIQ there was a nonsignificant trend to improved potency in the CaverMap group (71% versus 62%, p = 0.17). Of patients who had bilateral, unilateral and no response to stimulation after resection erectile function assessed by SFIQ recovered in 68%, 27% and 0%, respectively (p = 0.016). Conclusions: CaverMap assisted prostatectomy led to improved erectile function as assessed by RigiScan testing with no associated adverse events. A response to stimulation immediately after removal of the prostate accurately predicted return of erectile function.
引用
收藏
页码:1573 / 1578
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] *AM UR ASS PROST C, 1995, REP MAN CLIN LOC PRO, pA20
  • [2] SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION AND ELECTROEJACULATION IN MEN WITH SPINAL-CORD INJURY - REVIEW
    BENNETT, CJ
    SEAGER, SW
    VASHER, EA
    MCGUIRE, EJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 139 (03) : 453 - 457
  • [3] AUTONOMIC CONTROL AND VASCULAR CHANGES DURING PENILE ERECTION IN MONKEYS
    CREED, KE
    CARATI, CJ
    KEOGH, EJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 61 (06): : 510 - 515
  • [4] Gilbert W. Barritt, 1999, Journal of Urology, V161, P356
  • [5] SURGERY AS A PLACEBO
    JOHNSON, AG
    [J]. LANCET, 1994, 344 (8930) : 1140 - 1142
  • [6] Klotz L, 1998, UROLOGY, V52, P537, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00319-7
  • [7] Sildenafil citrate after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Lowentritt, BH
    Scardino, PT
    Miles, BJ
    Orejuela, FJ
    Schatte, EC
    Slawin, EM
    Elliott, SP
    Kim, ED
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (05) : 1614 - 1617
  • [8] INTRAOPERATIVE ELECTROSTIMULATION OF THE CAVERNOUS NERVE - TECHNIQUE, RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
    LUE, TF
    GLEASON, CA
    BROCK, GB
    CARROLL, PR
    TANAGHO, EA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (04) : 1426 - 1428
  • [9] ELECTROSTIMULATION AND PENILE ERECTION
    LUE, TF
    SCHMIDT, RA
    TANAGHO, EA
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1985, 40 (01) : 60 - 64
  • [10] LUE TF, 1984, SURG FORUM, V35, P628