Receptiveness and Responsiveness Toward Using Social Media for Safe Firearm Storage Outreach: Mixed Methods Study

被引:4
作者
Lam, Esther [1 ]
Moreno, Megan [2 ]
Bennett, Elizabeth [3 ]
Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, UW Box 351619, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[3] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
firearm storage; gun safety; public health outreach; social media; mixed methods; family; INTERVENTIONS; HOUSEHOLDS; SUICIDE; ONLINE; RISK;
D O I
10.2196/24458
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Childhood and adolescent firearm injury and death rates have increased over the past decade and remain major public health concerns in the United States. Safe firearm storage has proven to be an effective measure to prevent firearm injury and death among youth. Social media has been used as an avenue to promote safe firearm storage, but perceptions of this tool remain unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine receptiveness and responsiveness in promoting firearm lock box and trigger lock giveaway events on social media, and to describe the characteristics of participants who learned of these events through social media. Methods: We performed a mixed methods study combining a content analysis of Facebook event post comments, quantitative analysis of positive and negative feedback on social media, and a descriptive analysis of event participant characteristics. Through a qualitative content analysis approach, we thematically coded comments from each event's social media page posting. Interrater reliability and x statistics were calculated. We calculated the prevalence of positive and negative feedback data. Further, we calculated descriptive statistics for demographic characteristics gathered from day-of-event intake surveys. Differences between collected measures were analyzed with chi(2) and t tests according to how the participant found out about the event (social media vs other means). Using concurrent analysis, we synthesized the results from both the qualitative and quantitative aims. Results: Through qualitative content analysis, 414 comments from 13 events were coded. Seven themes emerged through the comment coding process with the most common being "positive receptiveness" (294/414, 71.0%). From quantitative analysis of the social media content, we found higher levels of positive feedback compared to negative feedback. The average number of event post "likes" was 1271.3 per event, whereas the average count in which "hide post" was clicked was 72.3 times per event. Overall, 35.9% (1457/4054) of participants found out about the event through social media. The participants who learned about the event through social media were on average significantly younger than those who learned about the event through other means (-6.4 years, 95% CI -5.5 to -7.3). Among the group that learned of the event through social media, 43.9% (629/1433) identified as female, whereas 35.5% (860/2420) identified as female among the group that learned of the event through other means. Conclusions: There was overall positive receptiveness and responsiveness toward firearm lock box and trigger lock giveaway events when promoted on social media. Compared with other promotional tools, social media has the ability to reach those who are younger and those who identify as female. Future studies should extend this research to determine whether there is a difference between rural and urban settings, and consider other social media platforms in the analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Researchers Using Social Media for Detecting and Monitoring Adverse Events Data: Multi Methods Study
    Golder, Su
    Scantlebury, Arabella
    Christmas, Helen
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (08)
  • [22] Attitudes Toward School-Based Surveillance of Adolescents' Social Media Activity: Convergent Parallel Mixed Methods Survey
    Burke, Colin
    Triplett, Cynthia
    Rubanovich, Caryn Kseniya
    Karnaze, Melissa M.
    Bloss, Cinnamon S.
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2024, 8
  • [23] Defining Potentially Unprofessional Behavior on Social Media for Health Care Professionals: Mixed Methods Study
    Rukavina, Tea Vukusic
    Poplasen, Lovela Machala
    Majer, Marjeta
    Relic, Danko
    Viskic, Josko
    Marelic, Marko
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 8 (03):
  • [24] "The stakes could not be higher": A mixed methods study of parental social media use in pediatric oncology
    Foot, Elizabeth
    Leonhard, Amanda
    Majeski, Jill
    Zahn, Lauren
    Li, Hsin H.
    Brown, Amy E. Caruso
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2021, 68 (11)
  • [25] Social media for learning: A mixed methods study on high school students' technology affordances and perspectives
    Mao, Jin
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 33 : 213 - 223
  • [26] Acceptance of Social Media Recruitment for Clinical StudiesAmong Patients With Hepatitis B:Mixed Methods Study
    Willem, Theresa
    Zimmermann, Bettina M.
    Matthes, Nina
    Rost, Michael
    Buyx, Alena
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [27] Exposure to e-cigarette information and advertising in social media and e-cigarette use in Australia: A mixed methods study
    Amin, Samia
    Dunn, Adam G.
    Laranjo, Liliana
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2020, 213
  • [28] Using a Design Thinking Approach to Develop a Social Media-Based Parenting Program for Parents of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Mixed Methods Study
    Yam-Ubon, Umaporn
    Thongseiratch, Therdpong
    JMIR PEDIATRICS AND PARENTING, 2023, 6
  • [29] World Vaping Day: Contextualizing Vaping Culture in Online Social Media Using a Mixed Methods Approach
    Colditz, Jason B.
    Welling, Joel
    Smith, Noah A.
    James, A. Everette
    Primack, Brian A.
    JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (02) : 196 - 215
  • [30] Perspectives of Rare Disease Social Media Group Participants on Engaging With Genetic Counselors: Mixed Methods Study
    Yabumoto, Megan
    Miller, Emily
    Rao, Anoushka
    Tabor, Holly K.
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    Halley, Meghan C.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (12)