Receptiveness and Responsiveness Toward Using Social Media for Safe Firearm Storage Outreach: Mixed Methods Study

被引:4
|
作者
Lam, Esther [1 ]
Moreno, Megan [2 ]
Bennett, Elizabeth [3 ]
Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, UW Box 351619, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[3] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
firearm storage; gun safety; public health outreach; social media; mixed methods; family; INTERVENTIONS; HOUSEHOLDS; SUICIDE; ONLINE; RISK;
D O I
10.2196/24458
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Childhood and adolescent firearm injury and death rates have increased over the past decade and remain major public health concerns in the United States. Safe firearm storage has proven to be an effective measure to prevent firearm injury and death among youth. Social media has been used as an avenue to promote safe firearm storage, but perceptions of this tool remain unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine receptiveness and responsiveness in promoting firearm lock box and trigger lock giveaway events on social media, and to describe the characteristics of participants who learned of these events through social media. Methods: We performed a mixed methods study combining a content analysis of Facebook event post comments, quantitative analysis of positive and negative feedback on social media, and a descriptive analysis of event participant characteristics. Through a qualitative content analysis approach, we thematically coded comments from each event's social media page posting. Interrater reliability and x statistics were calculated. We calculated the prevalence of positive and negative feedback data. Further, we calculated descriptive statistics for demographic characteristics gathered from day-of-event intake surveys. Differences between collected measures were analyzed with chi(2) and t tests according to how the participant found out about the event (social media vs other means). Using concurrent analysis, we synthesized the results from both the qualitative and quantitative aims. Results: Through qualitative content analysis, 414 comments from 13 events were coded. Seven themes emerged through the comment coding process with the most common being "positive receptiveness" (294/414, 71.0%). From quantitative analysis of the social media content, we found higher levels of positive feedback compared to negative feedback. The average number of event post "likes" was 1271.3 per event, whereas the average count in which "hide post" was clicked was 72.3 times per event. Overall, 35.9% (1457/4054) of participants found out about the event through social media. The participants who learned about the event through social media were on average significantly younger than those who learned about the event through other means (-6.4 years, 95% CI -5.5 to -7.3). Among the group that learned of the event through social media, 43.9% (629/1433) identified as female, whereas 35.5% (860/2420) identified as female among the group that learned of the event through other means. Conclusions: There was overall positive receptiveness and responsiveness toward firearm lock box and trigger lock giveaway events when promoted on social media. Compared with other promotional tools, social media has the ability to reach those who are younger and those who identify as female. Future studies should extend this research to determine whether there is a difference between rural and urban settings, and consider other social media platforms in the analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selecting talent using social networks: A mixed-methods study
    Melao, Nuno
    Reis, Joao
    HELIYON, 2020, 6 (04)
  • [2] Pragmatics to Reveal Intent in Social Media Peer Interactions: Mixed Methods Study
    Singh, Tavleen
    Olivares, Sofia
    Cohen, Trevor
    Cobb, Nathan
    Wang, Jing
    Franklin, Amy
    Myneni, Sahiti
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (11)
  • [3] Expressed Symptoms and Attitudes Toward Using Twitter for Health Care Engagement Among Patients With Lupus on Social Media: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
    Bunyan, Alden
    Venuturupalli, Swamy
    Reuter, Katja
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (05):
  • [4] Hidden Communities of Practice in Social Media Groups: Mixed Methods Study
    Skelton, Kara
    Evans, Retta
    LaChenaye, Jenna
    JMIR PEDIATRICS AND PARENTING, 2020, 3 (01):
  • [5] Probing Public Perceptions of Antidepressants on Social Media: Mixed Methods Study
    Zhu, Jianfeng
    Zhang, Xinyu
    Jin, Ruoming
    Jiang, Hailong
    Kenne, Deric R.
    Zhu, Jianfeng
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2025, 9
  • [6] Internet and Social Media Access Among Youth Experiencing Homelessness: Mixed-Methods Study
    VonHoltz, Lauren A. Houdek
    Frasso, Rosemary
    Golinkoff, Jesse M.
    Lozano, Alicia J.
    Hanlon, Alexandra
    Dowshen, Nadia
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (05)
  • [7] Mixed Methods for Human-Computer Interactions Research: An Iterative Study Using Reddit and Social Media
    Schrader, Peter G.
    Carroll, Mark C.
    McCreery, Michael P.
    Head, Danielle L.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (04) : 818 - 841
  • [8] A Typology of Social Media Use by Human Service Nonprofits: Mixed Methods Study
    Xue, Jia
    Shier, Micheal L.
    Chen, Junxiang
    Wang, Yirun
    Zheng, Chengda
    Chen, Chen
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [9] Translating Evidence Into Practice via Social Media: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Maloney, Stephen
    Tunnecliff, Jacqueline
    Morgan, Prue
    Gaida, Jamie E.
    Clearihan, Lyn
    Sadasivan, Sivalal
    Davies, David
    Ganesh, Shankar
    Mohanty, Patitapaban
    Weiner, John
    Reynolds, John
    Ilic, Dragan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (10)
  • [10] Cardiac Patients' Experiences and Perceptions of Social Media: Mixed-Methods Study
    Partridge, Stephanie R.
    Grunseit, Anne C.
    Gallagher, Patrick
    Freeman, Becky
    O'Hara, Blythe J.
    Neubeck, Lis
    Due, Sarah
    Paull, Glenn
    Ding, Ding
    Bauman, Adrian
    Phongsavan, Philayrath
    Roach, Kellie
    Sadler, Leonie
    Glinatsis, Helen
    Gallagher, Robyn
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (09)