Empowerment without Accountability? The Lawyers' Movement in Pakistan and its Aftershocks

被引:4
作者
Khan, Maryam S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Dev & Econ Alternat IDEAS, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES | 2019年 / 50卷 / 03期
关键词
Lawyers' Movement; political lawyering; legal mobilisation; judicial empowerment; accountability; Pakistan bar; legal complex; legal professions; sociology of lawyers; social movements;
D O I
10.19088/1968-2019.130
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
This case study on the Pakistan Lawyers' Movement and its aftermath aims to add to our knowledge of judicial empowerment processes, particularly the role of lawyers in mobilising for an independent judiciary, and the conditions for political lawyering as an effective pathway to judicial empowerment. In exploring these processes and conditions of empowerment, the study also examines their relationship with the longerterm outcomes of empowerment as well as the nexus between judicial empowerment and accountability of legal institutions. The study marshals evidence from multiple sources - including 35 qualitative interviews with movement leaders and participants, and a representative survey of active litigators in the Lahore District judiciary - to show, firstly, that the conditions that create successful mobilisation for judicial empowerment can significantly limit the systemic benefits of such mobilisation and, secondly, that the conditions for and the pathway to empowerment may deeply constrain the accountability of the empowered actors and institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 71
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Abbas A., 2009, RAY HOPE CASE LAWYER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, DawnOctober 7
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Express Tribune
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EXPRESS TRIBUNE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, NY TIMES
[6]  
Bhatti, 2018, DAWN
[7]  
Cohen Stephen., 2002, CONTEMP SOUTH ASIA, P311
[8]  
Gazdar H., 2009, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V44, P10
[9]  
Gul I., 2018, DAILY TIMES
[10]  
Halliday TC, 2012, FATES OF POLITICAL LIBERALISM IN THE BRITISH POST-COLONY: THE POLITICS OF THE LEGAL COMPLEX, P3