Is early word-form processing stress-full? How natural variability supports recognition

被引:35
作者
Bortfeld, Heather [1 ,2 ]
Morgan, James L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Psychol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Haskins Labs Inc, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
Infants; Word recognition; Emphatic stress; Nonemphatic stress; Focus stress; Segmentation; Language development; INFANT-DIRECTED SPEECH; LEXICAL STRESS; CROSS-LANGUAGE; MOTHERS SPEECH; BABY TALK; SEGMENTATION; INFORMATION; PREFERENCE; PERCEPTION; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In a series of studies, we examined how mothers naturally stress words across multiple mentions in speech to their infants and how this marking influences infants' recognition of words in fluent speech. We first collected samples of mothers' infant-directed speech using a technique that induced multiple repetitions of target words. Acoustic analyses revealed that mothers systematically alternated between emphatic and nonemphatic stress when talking to their infants. Using the headturn preference procedure, we then tested 7.5-month-old infants on their ability to detect familiarized bisyllabic words in fluent speech. Stress of target words (emphatic and nonemphatic) was systematically varied across familiarization and recognition phases of four experiments. Results indicated that, although infants generally prefer listening to words produced with emphatic stress, recognition was enhanced when the degree of emphatic stress at familiarization matched the degree of emphatic stress at recognition. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 266
页数:26
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Influences of high and low variability on infant word recognition [J].
不详 .
COGNITION, 2008, 106 (02) :833-870
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Radical pragmatics
[3]  
Aslin RN, 1996, SIGNAL TO SYNTAX: BOOTSTRAPPING FROM SPEECH TO GRAMMAR IN EARLY ACQUISITION, P117
[4]   Word recognition in individuals with left and right hemisphere damage: The role of lexical stress [J].
Baum, SR .
APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2002, 23 (02) :233-246
[5]  
BERNSTEINRATNER N, 1986, J PHONETICS, V14, P303
[6]   INTONATIONAL MARKING OF GIVEN AND NEW INFORMATION - SOME CONSEQUENCES FOR COMPREHENSION [J].
BOCK, JK ;
MAZZELLA, JR .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1983, 11 (01) :64-76
[7]  
Boersma P., 2002, PRAAT SYSTEM DOING P
[8]   INTONATION AND ITS PARTS [J].
BOLINGER, D .
LANGUAGE, 1982, 58 (03) :505-533
[9]   Mommy and Me -: Familiar names help launch babies into speech-stream segmentation [J].
Bortfeld, H ;
Morgan, JL ;
Golinkoff, RM ;
Rathbun, K .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (04) :298-304
[10]   Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words [J].
Bradlow, AR ;
Nygaard, LC ;
Pisoni, DB .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1999, 61 (02) :206-219