Rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Shim, So-Jung [1 ]
Chan, Mei [1 ,2 ]
Owens, Louisa [1 ,2 ]
Jaffe, Adam [1 ,2 ]
Prentice, Bernadette [1 ,2 ]
Homaira, Nusrat [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Discipline Pediat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Sydney Childrens Hosp Randwick, Resp Dept, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
heart diseases; human; influenza; lung diseases; oseltamivir; SEASONAL INFLUENZA; HOSPITALIZED CHILDREN; COMPLICATIONS; INFECTIONS; BENEFITS; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/hsr2.241
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundOseltamivir is recommended in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations, including those with chronic heart and lung diseases. ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in these groups of patients. MethodsThe protocol for the systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019125998). Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials published up to 16 February 2020. Quality appraisal of final studies was conducted using GRADE guidelines. Data were extracted using a predeveloped template. Main outcomes measured included the rate of use of oseltamivir for influenza-like-illness and its effectiveness in reducing disease severity in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. Outcomes measured for effectiveness were influenza-related complications (respiratory infections and asthma exacerbations), hospitalization rates, and time to freedom from illness. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials and Cochrane's Risk of Bias in nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool for nonrandomized trials. Where data were available, pooled analyses were conducted. Dichotomous variables were evaluated using the Mantel-Hansel method. A random effect model was applied. Summary measures were reported as risk ratios where relevant. ResultsOur systematic review identified nine studies. Oseltamivir use ranged from 25% to 100%. When oseltamivir group was compared to placebo, rates of respiratory tract infections reduced by 28% (RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59-0.90), hospitalization reduced by 52% (RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.28-0.80) and median time to illness alleviation decreased by 10.4 to 120hours. There was no significant reduction in asthma exacerbation rates. ConclusionsOur systematic review suggests that the use of oseltamivir is beneficial in reducing disease severity, however, its use in high-risk population remains suboptimal.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lauren C. Ramsay
    Sarah A. Buchan
    Robert G. Stirling
    Benjamin J. Cowling
    Shuo Feng
    Jeffrey C. Kwong
    Bryna F. Warshawsky
    BMC Medicine, 17
  • [32] The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ramsay, Lauren C.
    Buchan, Sarah A.
    Stirling, Robert G.
    Cowling, Benjamin J.
    Feng, Shuo
    Kwong, Jeffrey C.
    Warshawsky, Bryna F.
    BMC MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [33] Influenza Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness in Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Trang Ho Thu Quach
    Nicholas Alexander Mallis
    José F. Cordero
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2020, 24 : 229 - 240
  • [34] Herbal Medicine Treatment for Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Choi, Minhyung
    Lee, Sun Haeng
    Chang, Gyu Tae
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (07): : 1553 - 1576
  • [35] Corticosteroids as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Influenza: An Updated Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lansbury, Louise E.
    Rodrigo, Chamira
    Leonardi-Bee, Jo
    Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan
    Shen Lim, Wei
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (02) : E98 - E106
  • [36] Influenza vaccination reduces dementia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Veronese, Nicola
    Demurtas, Jacopo
    Smith, Lee
    Michel, Jean Pierre
    Barbagallo, Mario
    Bolzetta, Francesco
    Noale, Marianna
    Maggi, Stefania
    AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2022, 73
  • [37] Effect of Probiotics on Common Cold, Influenza, and Influenza-Like Illness A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nour, Mohammad Ghasemi
    Heidari, Masoumeh
    Noghondar, Leila Amini
    Rezayat, Arash Akhavan
    Hakim, Hakime Ghadiri
    Emrani, Naghmeh
    Ahanchian, Hamid
    TOPICS IN CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2023, 38 (03) : 196 - 210
  • [38] The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Klein, Eili Y.
    Monteforte, Bradley
    Gupta, Alisha
    Jiang, Wendi
    May, Larissa
    Hsieh, Yu-Hsiang
    Dugas, Andrea
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2016, 10 (05) : 394 - 403
  • [39] Indigenous communities and influenza: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alves, D. E.
    Rogeberg, O.
    Sattenspiel, L.
    Mamelund, S.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [40] Effectiveness of influenza vaccines in preventing severe influenza illness among adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design case-control studies
    Rondy, Marc
    El Omeiri, Nathalie
    Thompson, Mark G.
    Leveque, Alain
    Moren, Alain
    Sullivan, Sheena G.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2017, 75 (05) : 381 - 394