Rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Shim, So-Jung [1 ]
Chan, Mei [1 ,2 ]
Owens, Louisa [1 ,2 ]
Jaffe, Adam [1 ,2 ]
Prentice, Bernadette [1 ,2 ]
Homaira, Nusrat [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Discipline Pediat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Sydney Childrens Hosp Randwick, Resp Dept, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
heart diseases; human; influenza; lung diseases; oseltamivir; SEASONAL INFLUENZA; HOSPITALIZED CHILDREN; COMPLICATIONS; INFECTIONS; BENEFITS; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/hsr2.241
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundOseltamivir is recommended in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations, including those with chronic heart and lung diseases. ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in these groups of patients. MethodsThe protocol for the systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019125998). Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials published up to 16 February 2020. Quality appraisal of final studies was conducted using GRADE guidelines. Data were extracted using a predeveloped template. Main outcomes measured included the rate of use of oseltamivir for influenza-like-illness and its effectiveness in reducing disease severity in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. Outcomes measured for effectiveness were influenza-related complications (respiratory infections and asthma exacerbations), hospitalization rates, and time to freedom from illness. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials and Cochrane's Risk of Bias in nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool for nonrandomized trials. Where data were available, pooled analyses were conducted. Dichotomous variables were evaluated using the Mantel-Hansel method. A random effect model was applied. Summary measures were reported as risk ratios where relevant. ResultsOur systematic review identified nine studies. Oseltamivir use ranged from 25% to 100%. When oseltamivir group was compared to placebo, rates of respiratory tract infections reduced by 28% (RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59-0.90), hospitalization reduced by 52% (RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.28-0.80) and median time to illness alleviation decreased by 10.4 to 120hours. There was no significant reduction in asthma exacerbation rates. ConclusionsOur systematic review suggests that the use of oseltamivir is beneficial in reducing disease severity, however, its use in high-risk population remains suboptimal.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The efficacy of masks for influenza-like illness in the community A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Hua
    Chen, Mao-Bing
    Cui, Wei-Yan
    Xu, Hua-Lan
    Zheng, Qi-Han
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (23)
  • [22] A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial of oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza in a high-risk Chinese population
    Lin, JT
    Yu, XZ
    Cui, DJ
    Chen, XY
    Zhu, JH
    Wang, YZ
    Wu, XD
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (01) : 75 - 82
  • [23] Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for high-risk patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Zhengyan
    Zhao, Yan
    Liu, Yezhou
    Yu, Deliang
    Zhao, Qingchuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 65 : 52 - 60
  • [24] Effectiveness of gentamicin for gonorrhoea treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dowell, Deborah
    Kirkcaldy, Robert D.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2012, 88 (08) : 589 - 594
  • [25] Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir as the treatment for influenza virus infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shiraishi, Chihiro
    Kato, Hideo
    Hagihara, Mao
    Asai, Nobuhiro
    Iwamoto, Takuya
    Mikamo, Hiroshige
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2024, 30 (03) : 242 - 249
  • [26] Hand hygiene and risk of influenza virus infections in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wong, V. W. Y.
    Cowling, B. J.
    Aiello, A. E.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2014, 142 (05) : 922 - 932
  • [27] Effect of Influenza Vaccination on Risk of Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Kyu Rae
    Bae, Jeong Hun
    Hwang, In Cheol
    Kim, Kyoung Kon
    Suh, Heuy Sun
    Ko, Ki Dong
    NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 48 (3-4) : 103 - 110
  • [28] Influenza Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness in Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Quach Trang Ho Thu
    Mallis, Nicholas Alexander
    Cordero, Jose F.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 24 (02) : 229 - 240
  • [29] Does repeated influenza vaccination attenuate effectiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jones-Gray, Elenor
    Robinson, Elizabeth J.
    Kucharski, Adam J.
    Fox, Annette
    Sullivan, Sheena G.
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (01) : 27 - 44
  • [30] Influenza vaccination during pregnancy for prevention of influenza confirmed illness in the infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nunes, Marta C.
    Madhi, Shabir A.
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2018, 14 (03) : 758 - 766