Efficacy of acupuncture in management of premenstrual syndrome: A systematic review

被引:10
作者
Cho, Seung-Hun [1 ]
Kim, Jongwoo [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Hosp Korean Med, Kyung Hee Univ Med Ctr, Seoul 130701, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Stress Clin, EW Neo Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Acupuncture; Premenstrual syndrome; Systematic review; Randomised controlled trials; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; ADVERSE-REACTIONS; QUALITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctim.2009.12.001
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Background: The effectiveness of acupuncture in the case of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is not fully understood. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of acupuncture for the symptomatic treatment of PMS from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Search strategy: Electronic databases, including English, Korean, Japanese and Chinese, were systematically searched up to January 2009 with no language restrictions. Selection criteria: RCTs comparing acupuncture with control investigating acupuncture for PMS were considered. Data collection and analysis: Study collection and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers using the criteria described in the Cochrane Handbook. Main results: Nine studies were systematically reviewed. Only two of the nine trials reported details regarding sequence generation and allocation concealment. Four studies reported a significant difference in reduction of PMS symptoms for acupuncture treatment compared with pharmacological treatment. Two studies reported the improvements in primary symptoms within the acupuncture and herbal medications groups compared with baseline. Only two RCTs reported information regarding acupuncture-related adverse events, which included one case of a small subcutaneous haematoma. Conclusions: Although the included trials showed that acupuncture may be beneficial to patients with PMS, there is insufficient evidence to support this conclusion due to methodological flaws in the studies, including unknowns in sequence generation, concealment of allocation, blinding and outcome measures. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 111
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]  
HAYMAN S, 1996, ANONYMOUS
[22]  
Higgins J., 2009, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470712184.CH8
[23]   Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses [J].
Kjaergard, LL ;
Villumsen, J ;
Gluud, C .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 135 (11) :982-989
[24]  
Liu Xiang-yang, 2006, Zhongguo Zhen Jiu, V26, P265
[25]  
Loke Y K, 2001, BMC Clin Pharmacol, V1, P3, DOI 10.1186/1472-6904-1-3
[26]   A comparison of three different sources of data in assessing the frequencies of adverse reactions to amiodarone [J].
Loke, YK ;
Derry, S ;
Aronson, JK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 57 (05) :616-621
[27]   Standards for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture: the STRICTA recommendations [J].
MacPherson, H ;
White, A ;
Cummings, M ;
Jobst, K ;
Rose, K ;
Niemtzow, R .
COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2001, 9 (04) :246-249
[28]   Timing and severity of symptoms associated with the menstrual cycle in a community-based sample in the Midwestern United States [J].
Meaden, PM ;
Hartlage, SA ;
Cook-Karr, J .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2005, 134 (01) :27-36
[29]   Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement [J].
Moher, D ;
Cook, DJ ;
Eastwood, S ;
Olkin, I ;
Rennie, D ;
Stroup, DF .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9193) :1896-1900
[30]   Premenstrual syndrome - Pathophysiologic considerations [J].
Mortola, JF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (04) :256-257