Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:50
|
作者
Yan, Dandan [1 ]
Jiao, Yang [2 ]
Yan, Honglin [1 ]
Liu, Tian [1 ]
Yan, Hong [2 ]
Yuan, Jingping [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Dept Pathol, Renmin Hosp, 238 Jiefang Rd, Wuhan 430060, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Toxicol, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Endocrine-disrupting chemical; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Risk factor; PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS; IMPAIRED GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; SEX STEROID-HORMONES; POLYCHLORINATED-BIPHENYLS; PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES; ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES; BISPHENOL-A; SERUM CONCENTRATIONS; EARLY-PREGNANCY; ADIPOSE-TISSUE;
D O I
10.1186/s12940-022-00858-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Objective: To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the relationship between endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), poly-brominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), phthalates (PAEs), and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods: Relevant studies from their inception to November 2021 were identified by searching EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science. The cohort and case-control studies that reported effect size with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of EDC exposure and GDM were selected. The heterogeneity among the included studies was quantified by I-2 statistic. Publication bias was evaluated through the Begg and Egger tests. Results: Twenty-five articles with a total of 23,796 participants were found. Results indicated that exposure to PCBs has a significant influence on the incidence of GDM (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.00--1.31; n = 8). The risk of GDM was found to be associated with PBDE exposure (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.15-1.53; n = 4). PAEs and PFASs exposure were also positively associated with the risk of GDM, with summary ORs of 1.10 (95% CI = 1.03-1.16; n = 7 for PAEs) and 1.09 (95% CI = 1.02-1.16; n = 11 for PFASs), respectively. When only cohort studies were considered, the summary OR between PCBs exposure and the risk of GDM was 0.99 (95% CI = 0.91-1.09; n = 5). Meanwhile, the summary ORs from cohort studies for PBDEs, PAEs, and PFASs exposure were 1.12 (95% CI = 1.00-1.26; n = 2), 1.08 (95% CI = 1.02-1.15; n = 5), and 1.06 (95% CI = 1.00-1.12; n = 8), respectively. The Beggs and Egger tests did not show publication bias, and the sensitivity analyses did not change the results in this meta-analysis. Conclusion: These results support that exposure to certain EDCs, including PCBs, PBDEs, PAEs, and PFAS, increase the risk of GDM. Further large-sample epidemiologic researches and mechanistic studies are needed to verify the potential relationship and biological mechanisms. These results are of public health significance because the daily EDC exposure is expected to increase the risk of GDM development.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dandan Yan
    Yang Jiao
    Honglin Yan
    Tian Liu
    Hong Yan
    Jingping Yuan
    Environmental Health, 21
  • [2] Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, risk of type 2 diabetes, and diabetes-related metabolic traits: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Yan
    Chou, Elizabeth L.
    Baecker, Aileen
    You, Nai-Chieh Y.
    Song, Yiqing
    Sun, Qi
    Liu, Simin
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2016, 8 (04) : 516 - 532
  • [3] Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis*
    Hirke, Amol
    Varghese, Bincy
    Varade, Shruti
    Adela, Ramu
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2023, 317
  • [4] Persistent organic pollutant exposure as a risk factor of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kouiti, Malak
    Castillo-Hermoso, Maria Angeles
    Youlyouz-Marfak, Ibtissam
    Khan, Khalid Saeed
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    Olmedo-Requena, Rocio
    Zamora, Javier
    Jimenez-Moleon, Jose Juan
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 (05) : 579 - 588
  • [5] Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and anthropometric measures of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ribeiro, Carolina Martins
    Soares Beserra, Bruna Teles
    Silva, Nadyellem Graciano
    Lima, Caroline Lourenco
    Silva Rocha, Priscilla Roberta
    Coelho, Michella Soares
    Rocha Neves, Francisco de Assis
    Amato, Angelica Amorim
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [6] Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Risk of Testicular Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Brauner, Elvira, V
    Lim, Youn-Hee
    Koch, Trine
    Uldbjerg, Cecilie S.
    Gregersen, Laura S.
    Pedersen, Marc K.
    Frederiksen, Hanne
    Petersen, Jorgen H.
    Coull, Brent A.
    Andersson, Anna-Maria
    Hickey, Martha
    Skakkebaek, Niels E.
    Hauser, Russ
    Juul, Anders
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2021, 106 (12) : E4834 - E4860
  • [7] Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Liu, Haiyan
    Sun, Yukun
    Ran, Longkai
    Li, Jiuling
    Shi, Yafei
    Mu, Chunguang
    Hao, Changfu
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [8] Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Delayed Onset of Lactogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Jing-Ling
    Pang, Shu-Qin
    Jiang, Xiu-Min
    Zheng, Qing-Xiang
    Han, Xue-Qi
    Zhang, Xiao-Yun
    Pan, Yu-Qing
    BREASTFEEDING MEDICINE, 2021, 16 (05) : 385 - 392
  • [9] The risk of endometriosis after exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals: a meta-analysis of 30 epidemiology studies
    Wen, Xue
    Xiong, Yao
    Qu, Xinlan
    Jin, Ling
    Zhou, Chun
    Zhang, Ming
    Zhang, Yuanzhen
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 (08) : 645 - 650
  • [10] Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review
    Lind, P. Monica
    Lind, Lars
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2018, 61 (07) : 1495 - 1502