Blood-pressure reduction with LCZ696, a novel dual-acting inhibitor of the angiotensin II receptor and neprilysin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active comparator study

被引:465
作者
Miguel Ruilope, Luis [1 ]
Dukat, Andrej [2 ]
Boehm, Michael [3 ]
Lacourciere, Yves [4 ]
Gong, Jianjian [5 ]
Lefkowitz, Martin P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Hosp 12 Octubre, Div Hypertens, E-28041 Madrid, Spain
[2] Comenius Univ, Dept Internal Med, Bratislava, Slovakia
[3] Univ Saarland, Dept Internal Med Cardiol Angiol & Intens Care 3, Homburg, Germany
[4] CHU Laval, Hypertens Res Unit, Laval, PQ, Canada
[5] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
关键词
PULSE PRESSURE; ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION; SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION; NATRIURETIC PEPTIDES; HEART-FAILURE; RISK; HEMODYNAMICS; OMAPATRILAT; CANDOXATRIL; ANGIOEDEMA;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61966-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background LCZ696 is a first-in-class inhibitor of the angiotensin II receptor and neprilysin. We aimed to establish whether the dual actions of LCZ696 lead to further lowering of blood pressure, compared with the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan. Methods 1328 patients aged 18-75 years with mild-to-moderate hypertension were randomly assigned (double-blind) to 8 weeks' treatment in one of eight groups: 100 mg (n=156 patients), 200 mg (n=169), or 400 mg (n=172) LCZ696; 80 mg (n=163), 160 mg (n=166), or 320 mg (n=164) valsartan; 200 mg AHU377 (n=165); or placebo (n=173). The primary endpoint was the mean difference across the three single-dose pairwise comparisons of LCZ696 versus valsartan (100 mg vs 80 mg, 200 mg vs 160 mg, and 400 mg vs 320 mg) in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure during the 8-week treatment period. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00549770. Findings 1215 patients completed the 8-week treatment period. The average reduction in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure across the doses of LCZ696 versus the appropriate comparator dose of valsartan showed significantly greater reductions with LCZ696 (mean reduction: -2.17 mm Hg, 95% CI -3.28 to 1.06; p<0.0001). The reduction in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure was significantly different for 200 mg LCZ696 versus 160 mg valsartan (-2.97 mm Hg, 95% CI -4.88 to 1.07, p=0.0023) and for 400 mg LCZ696 versus 320 mg valsartan (-2.70 mm Hg, -4.61 to -0.80, p=0.0055). LCZ696 was well tolerated and no cases of angio-oedema were reported; only three serious adverse events occurred during the 8-week treatment period, of which none was judged to be related to the study drug, and no patients died. Interpretation Compared with valsartan, dual-acting LCZ696 provides complementary and fully additive reduction of blood pressure, which suggests that the drug holds promise for treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1255 / 1266
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [11] Molecular biology of the natriuretic peptide system - Implications for physiology and hypertension
    Gardner, David G.
    Chen, Songcang
    Glenn, Denis J.
    Grigsby, Chris L.
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2007, 49 (03) : 419 - 426
  • [12] Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of LCZ696, a Novel Dual-Acting Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNi)
    Gu, Jessie
    Noe, Adele
    Chandra, Priya
    Al-Fayoumi, Suliman
    Ligueros-Saylan, Monica
    Sarangapani, Ramesh
    Maahs, Suzanne
    Ksander, Gary
    Rigel, Dean F.
    Jeng, Arco Y.
    Lin, Tsu-Han
    Zheng, Weiyi
    Dole, William P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 50 (04) : 401 - 414
  • [13] Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse pressure as predictors of risk for congestive heart failure in the Framingham Heart Study
    Haider, AW
    Larson, MG
    Franklin, SS
    Levy, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [14] Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial
    Julius, S
    Kjeldsen, SE
    Weber, M
    Brunner, HR
    Ekman, S
    Hansson, L
    Hua, TS
    Laragh, J
    McInnes, GT
    Mitchell, L
    Plat, F
    Schork, A
    Smith, B
    Zanchetti, A
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 363 (9426) : 2022 - 2031
  • [15] Omapatrilat and enalapril in patients with hypertension: The omapatrilat cardiovascular treatment vs. enalapril (OCTAVE) trial
    Kostis, OB
    Packer, M
    Black, HR
    Schmieder, R
    Henry, D
    Levy, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 17 (02) : 103 - 111
  • [16] Levin ER, 1998, NEW ENGL J MED, V339, P321
  • [17] RELATION OF PULSE PRESSURE AND BLOOD-PRESSURE SEDUCTION TO THE INCIDENCE OF MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    MADHAVAN, S
    OOI, WL
    COHEN, H
    ALDERMAN, MH
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 1994, 23 (03) : 395 - 401
  • [18] Omapatrilat reduces pulse pressure and proximal aortic stiffness in patients with systolic hypertension -: Results of the conduit hemodynamics of Omapatrilat International Research Study
    Mitchell, GF
    Izzo, JL
    Lacourcière, Y
    Ouellet, JP
    Neutel, J
    Qian, CL
    Kerwin, LJ
    Block, AJ
    Pfeffer, MA
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (25) : 2955 - 2961
  • [19] Nawarskas J J, 2000, Heart Dis, V2, P266
  • [20] Biology of natriuretic peptides and their receptors
    Pandey, KN
    [J]. PEPTIDES, 2005, 26 (06) : 901 - 932