Exploring Students' Use of a Mobile Application to Support Their Self-Regulated Learning Processes

被引:20
作者
Baars, Martine [1 ]
Khare, Sanyogita [1 ]
Ridderstap, Leonie [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Sch Social & Behav Sci, Dept Psychol Educ & Child Studies, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Sch Hist Culture & Commun, Fac Off, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
self-regulated learning; mobile application; motivation; self-efficacy; monitoring; MOTIVATIONAL PROFILES; GOAL CONTENTS; SEEKING HELP; EDUCATION; AUTONOMY; EFFICACY; METAANALYSIS; PERSISTENCE; STRATEGIES; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.793002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Being able to self-regulate one's learning is essential for academic success but is also very difficult for students. Especially first year students can be overwhelmed with the high study load and autonomy in higher education. To face this challenge, students' monitoring and self-regulated learning (SRL) processes are crucial. Yet, often students are not aware of effective SRL strategies or how to use them. In this study, the use of a mobile application with gamification elements (i.e., Ace Your Self-Study App) to support first-year university students' SRL processes was investigated. In Study 1a, the Ace your self-study app was implemented in a first-year psychology course, and students' SRL skills, motivation, self-efficacy, app use and satisfaction, and performance were measured. The results showed a significant increase in autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and metacognitive self-regulation skills (MSR-R) across the 5-week course. Moreover, students who used the mobile application with gamified elements showed higher autonomous motivation. Nevertheless, most students used the app only for a limited number of self-study sessions. In Study 1b, students' self-study experiences were captured using focus group interviews to shed some more light on why students did or did not use the app. The results show that if students feel they do not need support for their SRL processes during self-study, they are less inclined to use the app. Specifically, regarding using study strategies, it was found that only if students' strategies do not work well in their perception, they feel the need to change their way of studying and choose another strategy. These results are discussed in the context of theory on SRL and how to support it.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, HDB METACOGNITION SE
[2]   The relation between task-specific motivational profiles and training of self-regulated learning skills [J].
Baars, Martine ;
Wijnia, Lisette .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 64 :125-137
[3]  
Bandura A., 2006, SELF EFFICACY BELIEF, V5, P1, DOI DOI 10.1177/0022466910374211
[4]  
Biwer F, 2020, J APPL RES MEM COGN, V9, P186
[5]   Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions [J].
Bjork, Robert A. ;
Dunlosky, John ;
Kornell, Nate .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 :417-+
[6]  
Boyatzis R. E., 1998, TRANSFORMING QUALITA
[7]   Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review [J].
Broadbent, J. ;
Poon, W. L. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 27 :1-13
[8]   Effects of mobile-app learning diaries vs online training on specific self-regulated learning components [J].
Broadbent, Jaclyn ;
Panadero, Ernesto ;
Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 68 (05) :2351-2372
[9]  
Buckley Jim, 2018, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, V47, P101, DOI 10.1177/0047239518783153
[10]   Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation:: An approach/avoidance reformulation [J].
Covington, MV ;
Müeller, KJ .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2001, 13 (02) :157-176