Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels

被引:177
作者
Britten, RJ
Rowen, L
Williams, J
Cameron, RA
机构
[1] CALTECH, Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 USA
[2] Inst Syst Biol, Seattle, WA 98103 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0330964100
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
It was recently shown that indels are responsible for more than twice as many unmatched nucleotides as are base substitutions between samples of chimpanzee and human DNA. A larger sample has now been examined and the result is similar. The number of indels is approximate to1/12th of the number of base substitutions and the average length of the indels is 36 nt, including indels up to 10 kb. The ratio (R-u) of unpaired nucleotides attributable to indels to those attributable to substitutions is 3.0 for this 2 million-nt chimp DNA sample compared with human. There is similar evidence of a large value of R-u for sea urchins from the polymorphism of a sample of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus DNA (Ru = 3-4). Other work indicates that similarly, per nucleotide affected, large differences are seen for indels in the DNA polymorphism of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana (R-u = 51). For the insect Drosophila melanogaster a high value of R-u (4.5) has been determined. For the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans the polymorphism data are incomplete but high values of R-u are likely. Comparison of two strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7 shows a preponderance of indels. Because these six examples are from very distant systematic groups the implication is that in general, for alignments of closely related DNA, indels are responsible for many more unmatched nucleotides than are base substitutions. Human genetic evidence suggests that indels are a major source of gene defects, indicating that indels are a significant source of evolutionary change.
引用
收藏
页码:4661 / 4665
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Disease-causing mutations in the human genome
    Antonarakis, SE
    Krawczak, M
    Cooper, DN
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2000, 159 (Suppl 3) : S173 - S178
  • [2] Genetic mapping with SNP markers in Drosophila
    Berger, J
    Suzuki, T
    Senti, KA
    Stubbs, J
    Schaffner, G
    Dickson, BJ
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2001, 29 (04) : 475 - 481
  • [3] Divergence between samples of chimpanzee and human DNA sequences is 5%, counting indels
    Britten, RJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (21) : 13633 - 13635
  • [4] EVIDENCE THAT MOST HUMAN ALU SEQUENCES WERE INSERTED IN A PROCESS THAT CEASED ABOUT 30 MILLION YEARS AGO
    BRITTEN, RJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1994, 91 (13) : 6148 - 6150
  • [5] CACCONE A, 1989, EVOLUTION, V43, P925, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02540.x
  • [6] A SNP resource for human chromosome 22: Extracting dense clusters of SNPs from the genomic sequence
    Dawson, E
    Chen, Y
    Hunt, S
    Smink, LJ
    Hunt, A
    Rice, K
    Livingston, S
    Bumpstead, S
    Bruskiewich, R
    Sham, P
    Ganske, R
    Adams, M
    Kawasaki, K
    Shimizu, N
    Minoshima, S
    Roe, B
    Bentley, D
    Dunham, I
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2001, 11 (01) : 170 - 178
  • [7] Genomewide comparison of DNA sequences between humans and chimpanzees
    Ebersberger, I
    Metzler, D
    Schwarz, C
    Pääbo, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2002, 70 (06) : 1490 - 1497
  • [8] THE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF INSERTIONS AND DELETIONS IN HUMAN AND RODENT PSEUDOGENES SUGGESTS THE LOGARITHMIC GAP PENALTY FOR SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT
    GU, X
    LI, WH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 1995, 40 (04) : 464 - 473
  • [9] Hayashi T, 2001, DNA RES, V8, P11, DOI 10.1093/dnares/8.1.11
  • [10] Arabidopsis map-based cloning in the post-genome era
    Jander, G
    Norris, SR
    Rounsley, SD
    Bush, DF
    Levin, IM
    Last, RL
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 129 (02) : 440 - 450