Multicenter evaluation of the Access AMH antimullerian hormone assay for the prediction of antral follicle count and poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation

被引:31
作者
Baker, Valerie L. [1 ]
Gracia, Clarisa [2 ]
Glassner, Michael J. [3 ]
Schnell, Vicki L. [4 ]
Doody, Kevin [5 ]
Coddington, Charles C. [6 ]
Shin, Sanghyuk S. [7 ]
Marshall, Lorna A. [8 ]
Alper, Michael M. [9 ]
Morales, Arlene J. [10 ]
Pavone, Mary Ellen [11 ]
Behera, Millie A. [12 ]
Zbella, Edward A. [13 ]
Shapiro, Bruce S. [14 ]
Straseski, Joely A. [15 ]
Broyles, Dennis L. [7 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Main Line Fertil, Bryn Mawr, PA USA
[4] CORM, Webster, TX USA
[5] CARE, Dallas, TX USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Rochester, MN USA
[7] Beckman Coulter, Carlsbad, CA USA
[8] Pacific NW Fertil, Seattle, WA USA
[9] Boston IVF, Boston, MA USA
[10] Fertil Specialists Med Grp, San Diego, CA USA
[11] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[12] Bloom Reprod Inst, Phoenix, AZ USA
[13] Womens Med Res Grp, Clearwater, FL USA
[14] Fertil Ctr Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV USA
[15] Univ Utah, Dept Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Antimullerian hormone; ovarian response; antral follicle count; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; FERTILIZATION/INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; GOOD-PROGNOSIS PATIENTS; PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS; EXCESSIVE RESPONSE; CLINICAL UTILITY; RESERVE TESTS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.031
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate a new fully automated antimullerian hormone (AMH) assay for prediction of poor ovarian response (POR) to ovarian stimulation defined as four or fewer oocytes retrieved. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Thirteen private and academic fertility centers in the United Slates. Patients(s): A total of 178 women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle eligible for the study were consented and enrolled, with data available from 160 women for prediction of POR and 164 women for AMH correlation with antral follicle count (AFC). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cutoff point for AMH that predicts POR. Correlation of AMH with AFC, and cutoff point for AMH that correlates with antral follicle count >15. Result(s): The mean AMH among the poor responders was 0.74 ng/mL, compared with 3.20 ng/mL for normal to high responders. The AMH cutoff at 90% specificity for predicting POR with the use of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.93 ng/mL, with an associated sensitivity of 74.1%. For prediction of POR, ROC analysis showed that AMH (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.929) was significantly better than FSH (AUC - 0.615; P< .0001). AMH was positively correlated with AFC (Spearman rho = 0.756). The AMH at 90% sensitivity for AFC >15 was 1.75, with specificity of 59.1%. Conclusion(s): A fully automated AMH assay can be a useful biomarker for predicting POR in IVF cycles. Because AMH cutoff points vary depending on the assay used, future studies should continue to calibrate test results to clinically important outcomes. (C) 2018 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial
    Andersen, Anders Nyboe
    Nelson, Scott M.
    Fauser, Bart C. J. M.
    Garcia-Velasco, Juan Antonio
    Klein, Bjarke M.
    Arce, Joan-Carles
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 107 (02) : 387 - +
  • [2] Prospective study into the value of the automated Elecsys antimullerian hormone assay for the assessment of the ovarian growing follicle pool
    Anderson, Richard A.
    Anckaert, Ellen
    Bosch, Ernesto
    Dewailly, Didier
    Dunlop, Cheryl E.
    Fehr, Daniel
    Nardo, Luciano
    Smitz, Johan
    Tremellen, Kelton
    Denk, Barbara
    Geistanger, Andrea
    Hund, Martin
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (04) : 1074 - U281
  • [3] Antimullerian hormone in gonadotropin releasing-hormone antagonist cycles: prediction of ovarian response and cumulative treatment outcome in good-prognosis patients
    Arce, Joan-Carles
    La Marca, Antonio
    Klein, Bjarke Mirner
    Andersen, Anders Nyboe
    Fleming, Richard
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (06) : 1644 - +
  • [4] The antral follicle count: practical recommendations for better standardization
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    de Ziegler, Dominique
    Howles, Colin M.
    Gougeon, Alain
    Trew, Geoffrey
    Olivennes, Francois
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (03) : 1044 - 1051
  • [5] AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis
    Broer, S. L.
    Dolleman, M.
    Opmeer, B. C.
    Fauser, B. C.
    Mol, B. W.
    Broekmans, F. J. M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2011, 17 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [6] Anti-Mullerian hormone: ovarian reserve testing and its potential clinical implications
    Broer, Simone L.
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    Laven, Joop S. E.
    Fauser, Bart C. J. M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2014, 20 (05) : 688 - 701
  • [7] Prediction of an excessive response in in vitro fertilization from patient characteristics and ovarian reserve tests and comparison in subgroups: an individual patient data meta-analysis
    Broer, Simone L.
    Dolleman, Madeleine
    van Disseldorp, Jeroen
    Broeze, Kimiko A.
    Opmeer, Brent C.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Eijkemans, Martinus J. C.
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (02) : 420 - +
  • [8] Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach
    Broer, Simone L.
    van Disseldorp, Jeroen
    Broeze, Kimiko A.
    Dolleman, Madeleine
    Opmeer, Brent C.
    Bossuyt, Patrick
    Eijkemans, Marinus J. C.
    Mol, Ben-Willem J.
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    Anderson, R. A.
    Ashrafi, M.
    Bancsi, L.
    Caroppo, E.
    Copperman, A.
    Ebner, T.
    Geva, Eldar M.
    Erdem, M.
    Greenblatt, E. M.
    Jayaprakasan, K.
    Fenning, Raine
    Klinkert, E. R.
    Kwee, J.
    Lambalk, C. B.
    La Marca, A.
    McIlveen, M.
    Merce, L. T.
    Muttukrishna, S.
    Nelson, S. M.
    Ng, H. Y.
    Popovic-Todorovic, B.
    Smeenk, J. M. J.
    Tomas, C.
    Van der Linden, P. J. Q.
    van Rooij, I. A.
    Vladimirov, I. K.
    Bossuyt, P. B.
    Eijkemans, M. J. C.
    Mol, B. W.
    Broekmans, Frank
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2013, 19 (01) : 26 - 36
  • [9] Performance characteristics of the Access AMH assay for the quantitative determination of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels on the Access* family of automated immunoassay systems
    Demirdjian, Gaiane
    Bord, Stephanie
    Lejeune, Caroline
    Masica, Ryan
    Riviere, Dominique
    Nicouleau, Lucie
    Denizot, Philippe
    Marquet, Pierre-Yves
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 49 (16-17) : 1267 - 1273
  • [10] The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Mllerian hormone in women
    Dewailly, Didier
    Andersen, Claus Yding
    Balen, Adam
    Broekmans, Frank
    Dilaver, Nafi
    Fanchin, Renato
    Griesinger, Georg
    Kelsey, Tom W.
    La Marca, Antonio
    Lambalk, Cornelius
    Mason, Helen
    Nelson, Scott M.
    Visser, Jenny A.
    Wallace, W. Hamish
    Anderson, Richard A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2014, 20 (03) : 370 - 385