Immunohistochemical expression of Mdm2 and p53 in penile verrucous carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Ouban, A
Dellis, J
Salup, R
Morgan, M
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Tampa, FL USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Tampa, FL USA
[3] James A Haley Vet Hosp, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
Mdm2; p53; verrucous carcinoma; squamous cell carcinoma; penis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Verrucous carcinoma (VC) of the penis is an uncommon squamous tumor that pursues a biologically indolent course. Unlike conventional squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, pathogenic roles for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and p53 mutation have not been reported in VC. We compared the immunohistochemical expression of Mdm2 and p53 in 7 cases of VC and 7 cases of SCC. The Mdm2 gene product preferentially labeled the perinuclear membrane in the granular layer of VC tumor cells, whereas SCC cases showed weak, focal, cytoplasmic staining for Mdm2. The mean labeling index for Mdm2 was higher in VC compared to SCC [79.3 (SE +/- 7.2) in VC vs 18.3 (SE +/- 2.4) in SCC, p <0.001]. In SCC cases, the normal surrounding skin showed mild granular-layer staining and dysplastic foci that failed to stain with Mdm2 antibody. Weak p53 immunolabeling was seen within nuclei of scattered tumor cells in the cases of VC, whereas the SCC cases showed strong nuclear staining of p53 throughout the tumors. The mean labeling index for p53 was lower in VC compared to SCC [24.8 (SE +/- 3.9) in VC vs 64.7 (SE +/- 9.0) in SCC, p <0.01]. In SCC cases, the normal surrounding skin showed moderate staining for p53, preferentially confined to the basal layer. Dysplastic foci in the cases of SCC showed increased p53 labeling. In summary, immunohistochemical analysis showed significantly different levels of expression of Mdm2 and p53 in penile VC vs SCC. Overexpression of the Mdm2 gene product may be important in the pathogenesis of VC. Since Mdm2 is a negative regulator of p53, overexpression of Mdm2 may explain why p53 is downregulated and, therefore, permissive to oncogenic transformation.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 106
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A research on the protein expression of p53, p16, and MDM2 in endometriosis
    Sang, Lin
    Fang, Qian-Jin
    Zhao, Xing-Bo
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (14)
  • [32] The expression of the mdm2 gene may be related to the aberration of the p53 gene in human hepatocellular carcinoma
    Qiu, SJ
    Ye, SL
    Wu, ZQ
    Tang, ZY
    Liu, YK
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 124 (05) : 253 - 258
  • [33] The expression of the mdm2 gene may be related to the aberration of the p53 gene in human hepatocellular carcinoma
    Shuang-Jian Qiu
    Sheng-Long Ye
    Zhi-Quan Wu
    Zhao-You Tang
    Yin-Kun Liu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 1998, 124 : 253 - 258
  • [34] Positive effect of Mdm2 on p53 expression explains excitability of p53 in response to DNA damage
    Elias, Jan
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 418 : 94 - 104
  • [35] RYBP stabilizes p53 by modulating MDM2
    Chen, Deng
    Zhang, Jianbing
    Li, Mao
    Rayburn, Elizabeth R.
    Wang, Hui
    Zhang, Ruiwen
    EMBO REPORTS, 2009, 10 (02) : 166 - 172
  • [36] Mdm2: Keeping p53 under control
    Piette, J
    Neel, H
    Marechal, V
    ONCOGENE, 1997, 15 (09) : 1001 - 1010
  • [37] Clinical significance of p53, MDM2 and bcl-2 expression in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder
    Uchida, T
    Minei, S
    Gao, JP
    Wang, CY
    Satoh, T
    Baba, S
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2002, 9 (02) : 253 - 259
  • [38] p53 and Mdm2: not all cells are equal
    Coates, P. J.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2007, 213 (04) : 357 - 359
  • [39] The Mdm2 and p53 genes are conserved in the Arachnids
    Lane, David P.
    Cheok, Chit Fang
    Brown, Christopher J.
    Madhumalar, Arumugam
    Ghadessy, Farid J.
    Verma, Chandra
    CELL CYCLE, 2010, 9 (04) : 748 - 754
  • [40] Transcription factors that interact with p53 and Mdm2
    Inoue, Kazushi
    Fry, Elizabeth A.
    Frazier, Donna P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 138 (07) : 1577 - 1585