Multi-b-value diffusion weighted imaging for preoperative evaluation of risk stratification in early-stage endometrial cancer

被引:21
|
作者
Zhang, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Xiaoduo [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Lizhi [3 ]
Zhang, Miaomiao [1 ,2 ]
Ouyang, Han [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Xinming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Canc Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Radiol,Natl Canc Ctr, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[3] GE Healthcare, MR Res China, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Risk stratification; Multi-b-value diffusion weighted imaging (DWI); Perfusion; Diffusion; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; PERFUSION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.08.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the application of multi-b-value DWI parameters for the assessment of risk stratification in early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Material and methods: Fifty-three patients with early-stage EC who preoperatively underwent multi-b-value DWI with 13 b values (from 0 to 2000s/mm(2)) were included in this study. Multi-b-value DWI derived parameters, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), perfusion-related diffusivity (D*) and perfusion fraction (f) were measured independently by two radiologists. In addition, binary logical regression model was used to calculate predicative probability of combined parameters indicating statistical significance in differentiating risk stratification of early-stage endometrial cancer. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for all single and combined parameters. Results: The ADC and D values were significantly lower in intermedium-risk compared with low-risk (P = 0.000 and 0.011), as well as high-risk compared with low-risk of early-stage EC (P = 0.001 and 0.013), while f values only showed significant differences between low-risk and intermedium-risk groups (P = 0.011). Among the single parameters, the ADC values had the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) in the identification of the low-risk of early-stage EC (AUC = 0.892). Moreover, the combination of ADC and f value had the best diagnostic performance with the AUC of 0.912, the sensitivity of 81.1% and the specificity of 87.5%. Conclusion: The multi-b-value DWI parameters provide valuable imaging biomarkers for the assessment of risk stratification in early-stage endometrial cancer. This approach might facilitate the selection of the optimal therapeutic approach and lead to the greater personalization of cancer care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer Radiotherapy: A Single Center Experience
    Demiral, S.
    Beyzadeoglu, M.
    Sager, O.
    Dincoglan, F.
    Uysal, B.
    Gamsiz, H.
    Akin, M.
    Turker, T.
    Dirican, B.
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (22) : 9599 - 9602
  • [32] Integrating pathology, chromosomal instability and mutations for risk stratification in early-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma
    Yuan Li
    Jiaqi Li
    Ensong Guo
    Jia Huang
    Guangguang Fang
    Shaohua Chen
    Bin Yang
    Yu Fu
    Fuxia Li
    Zizhuo Wang
    Rourou Xiao
    Chen Liu
    Yuhan Huang
    Xue Wu
    Funian Lu
    Lixin You
    Ling Feng
    Ling Xi
    Peng Wu
    Ding Ma
    Chaoyang Sun
    Beibei Wang
    Gang Chen
    Cell & Bioscience, 10
  • [33] Predicting Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma: Significance of Multiparametric MRI Radiomics Model
    Meng, Huan
    Sun, Yu-Feng
    Zhang, Yu
    Yu, Ya-Nan
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Jia-Ning
    Xue, Lin-Yan
    Yin, Xiao-Ping
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (01): : 81 - 91
  • [34] Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced parameters and intravoxel incoherent motion facilitate the prediction of TP53 status and risk stratification of early-stage endometrial carcinoma
    Wang, Hongxia
    Yan, Ruifang
    Li, Zhong
    Wang, Beiran
    Jin, Xingxing
    Guo, Zhenfang
    Liu, Wangyi
    Zhang, Meng
    Wang, Kaiyu
    Guo, Jinxia
    Han, Dongming
    RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 57 (02) : 257 - 269
  • [35] Preoperative Assessment of MRI-Invisible Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer With MRI-Based Radiomics Analysis
    Jiang, Xiaoting
    Song, Jiacheng
    Zhang, Aining
    Cheng, Wenjun
    Duan, Shaofeng
    Liu, Xisheng
    Chen, Ting
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 58 (01) : 247 - 255
  • [36] Concordance between preoperative ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and final histology in early-stage endometrial cancer
    Daix, Manon
    Angeles, Martina Aida
    Migliorelli, Federico
    Kakkos, Athanasios
    Gomez, Carlos Martinez
    Delbecque, Katty
    Mery, Eliane
    Tock, Stephanie
    Gabiache, Erwan
    Decuypere, Marjolein
    Goffin, Frederic
    Martinez, Alejandra
    Ferron, Gwenael
    Kridelka, Frederic
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 (04)
  • [37] Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in preoperative evaluation and prediction of postoperative supplementary therapy for patients with cervical cancer
    Liu, Liying
    Wang, Shuo
    Yu, Tao
    Bai, Haoyan
    Liu, Jingyu
    Wang, Danbo
    Luo, Yahong
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (02)
  • [38] Can preoperative magnetic resonance imaging replace intraoperative frozen sectioning in the evaluation of myometrial invasion for early-stage endometrial carcinoma?
    Karatasli, Volkan
    Cakir, Ilker
    Sahin, Hilal
    Ayaz, Duygu
    Sanci, Muzaffer
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2019, 90 (03) : 128 - 133
  • [39] Radiomics feature as a preoperative predictive of lymphovascular invasion in early-stage endometrial cancer: A multicenter study
    Liu, Xue-Fei
    Yan, Bi-Cong
    Li, Ying
    Ma, Feng-Hua
    Qiang, Jin-Wei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [40] Comparative analysis of the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating the histological features of endometrial cancer
    Yue, Wei
    Meng, Nan
    Wang, Jing
    Liu, Wenling
    Wang, Xuejia
    Yan, Minghuan
    Han, Dongming
    Cheng, Jingliang
    CANCER IMAGING, 2019, 19 (1):