Indicators used to measure the innovation process: defects and possible remedies

被引:46
作者
Dodgson, M [1 ]
Hinze, S
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Australi Asia Management Ctr, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res, D-76139 Karlsruhe 1, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.3152/147154400781777368
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Some diverse indicators used to measure the innovation process are considered, They include those with art aggregate, and often national, focus, and rely on data from scientific publications, patents and R&D expenditures, etc. Others have a firm-level perspective, relying primarily on surveys or case studies. Also included are indicators derived from specialized databases, or consensual agreements reached through foresight exercises. There is an obvious need for greater integration of the various approaches to capture move effectively the richness of available data and better reflect the reality of innovation. The focus for such integration could be in the area of technology strategy, which integrates the diverse scientific, technological, and innovation activities of firms within their operating environments; improved capacity to measure it has implications for policy-makers, managers and researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 114
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT J INNOV MANAGE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, GLOBAL RES STRATEGY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, TECHNOLOGICAL COLLAB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, The Machine that Changed the World
[6]  
[Anonymous], MANAGING TECHNOLOGY
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HDB IND INNOVATION
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1996, KNOWL BAS EC
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1990, NEW COMPETITION
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The Rise of the Network Society