Laboratory Tests for Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection Can Help Predict Outcomes of Two-Stage Exchange

被引:22
作者
Dwyer, Maureen K. [2 ,3 ]
Damsgaard, Christopher [4 ]
Wadibia, Jason [5 ]
Wong, Gordon [1 ]
Lazar, Damien [1 ]
Smith, Eric [6 ]
Talmo, Carl [4 ]
Bedair, Hany [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Newton Wellesley Hosp, Kaplan Joint Ctr, Newton, MA USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] New England Baptist Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[5] Philadelphia Coll Osteopath Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Boston Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
关键词
TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PREOPERATIVE PREDICTION; REVISION; FAILURE; REIMPLANTATION; DEBRIDEMENT; IRRIGATION; RISK;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.17.00599
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although 2-stage exchange arthroplasty is the most effective treatment among available strategies for managing chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), rates of its success vary greatly. The purpose of our study was to examine whether objective measurements collected at the time of the diagnosis of PJI could be used to identify patients at risk of failure of 2-stage exchange. Methods: We identified 205 patients across 4 institutions who underwent 2-stage exchange arthroplasty for the treatment of PJI following total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Demographic, surgical, and laboratory data were obtained for each patient from their medical chart. Laboratory values included serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level, synovial fluid white blood-cell (WBC) count and neutrophil percentage, synovial fluid and/or tissue culture, and Gram stain. Patients who underwent revision surgery for recurrent infection were considered to have failed the 2-stage procedure. Demographic, surgical, and laboratory variables were compared between the 2 groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine threshold cutoffs for significant laboratory values. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: Overall, 2-stage exchange was unsuccessful for 27.3% of the patients. Preoperative serum ESR (p = 0.035) and synovial fluid WBC count (p = 0.008) and neutrophil percentage (p = 0.041) were greater in patients with recurrent infection. ROC curve analysis revealed a threshold of >60,000 cells/mu L for synovial fluid WBC count, >92% for synovial fluid WBC neutrophil percentage, and >99 mm/hr for serum ESR. Failure of 2-stage exchange was 2.5 times more likely for patients with an elevated preoperative synovial fluid WBC count, 2.0 times more likely for those with an elevated preoperative synovial fluid WBC neutrophil percentage, and 1.8 times more likely for those with an elevated preoperative serum ESR. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that a greater number of patients in whom 2-stage exchange arthroplasty ultimately failed had a preoperative synovial fluid WBC count of >60,000 cells/mu L, a synovial fluid WBC neutrophil percentage of >92%, or a serum ESR of >99 mm/hr. Patients with elevated laboratory values had 1.8 to 2.5 times the risk of treatment failure. These data can serve as a clinical guideline to identify patients most at risk for failure of 2-stage exchange.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1015
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Failure of the first step of two-stage revision due to polymicrobial prosthetic joint infection of the hip
    Bozhkova S.
    Tikhilov R.
    Labutin D.
    Denisov A.
    Shubnyakov I.
    Razorenov V.
    Artyukh V.
    Rukina A.
    [J]. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2016, 17 (4) : 369 - 376
  • [2] The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization
    Bozic, KJ
    Ries, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (08) : 1746 - 1751
  • [3] The Preoperative Prediction of Success Following Irrigation and Debridement With Polyethylene Exchange for Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections
    Buller, Leonard T.
    Sabry, Fady Youssef
    Easton, Robert W.
    Klika, Alison K.
    Barsoum, Wael K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (06) : 857 - 864
  • [4] Cha Min Seok, 2015, Knee Surg Relat Res, V27, P82, DOI 10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.2.82
  • [5] Risk of Reinfection After Treatment of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Cochran, Adam R.
    Ong, Kevin L.
    Lau, Edmund
    Mont, Michael A.
    Malkani, Arthur L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (09) : S156 - S161
  • [6] Infection after primary hip arthroplasty A comparison of 3 Norwegian health registers
    Dale, Havard
    Skramm, Inge
    Lower, Hege L.
    Eriksen, Hanne M.
    Espehaug, Birgitte
    Furnes, Ove
    Skjeldestad, Finn Egil
    Havelin, Leif I.
    Engesaeter, Lars B.
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2011, 82 (06) : 646 - 654
  • [7] The Mark Coventry, MD, Award: Oral Antibiotics Reduce Reinfection After Two-Stage Exchange: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Frank, Jonathan M.
    Kayupov, Erdan
    Moric, Mario
    Segreti, John
    Hansen, Erik
    Hartman, Curtis
    Okroj, Kamil
    Belden, Katherine
    Roslund, Brian
    Silibovsky, Randi
    Parvizi, Javad
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [8] Staged Revision for Knee Arthroplasty Infection: What Is the Role of Serologic Tests Before Reimplantation?
    Ghanem, Elie
    Azzam, Khalid
    Seeley, Mark
    Joshi, Ashish
    Parvizi, Javad
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (07) : 1699 - 1705
  • [9] The Chitranjan Ranwat Award - Mid-term to long-term Followup of two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty
    Haleem, AA
    Berry, DJ
    Hanssen, AD
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (428) : 35 - 39
  • [10] Hart WJ, 2006, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V88B, P1011, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.88B8