Question selection for multi-attribute decision-aiding

被引:27
作者
Holloway, HA [1 ]
White, CC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Ind & Operat Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
decision analysis; dynamic programming; question selection;
D O I
10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00436-8
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A decision-maker (DM), or a group of DMs, must select a most preferred alternative from a finite set of alternatives. Each alternative has a single consequence. There are multiple and conflicting attributes. All value scores are known precisely. However, all that is known about the vector of trade-off weights is that it is a member of a given set, the tradeoff weight set. A facilitator can ask questions and use the responses to update the trade-off weight set and hence the set of non-dominated alternatives, i.e., those alternatives that are candidates for being a most preferred alternative. The DM can terminate this process at any point. Termination typically occurs when the non-dominated set contains a sufficiently small number of alternatives. The facilitator's role is to ask questions that efficiently lead the DM to a most preferred alternative. The objective of this research is to aid the facilitator in selecting the best question to ask next. We model the question-response process as a sequential decision-making problem under uncertainty and develop a dynamic programming-based approach that guarantees a finite, and hence potentially computable, representation of the expected optimal cost-to-go function. An example serves to illustrate the approach. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 533
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   A PENALTY-FUNCTION APPROACH TO ALTERNATIVE PAIRWISE COMPARISONS IN ISMAUT [J].
ANANDALINGAM, G ;
WHITE, CC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1993, 23 (01) :330-333
[2]   Dominance and potential optimality in multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecise information [J].
Athanassopoulos, AD ;
Podinovski, VV .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1997, 48 (02) :142-150
[3]  
Chajewska U, 2000, SEVENTEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AAAI-2001) / TWELFTH INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE (IAAI-2000), P363
[4]   OBTAINING NONDOMINATED PRIORITY VECTORS FOR MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS WITH DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF CARDINAL AND ORDINAL INFORMATION [J].
HANNAN, EL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1981, 11 (08) :538-543
[5]  
Kannan R, 1997, RANDOM STRUCT ALGOR, V11, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2418(199708)11:1<1::AID-RSA1>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-X
[7]  
Keeney R.L., 1976, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O
[8]  
LIN ZZ, 2001, EVOLUTIONARY OPTIMIZ
[9]   Tools for interactive multiattribute decisionmaking with incompletely identified information [J].
Park, KS ;
Kim, SH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 98 (01) :111-123
[10]  
Puterman M.L., 2014, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics