Technique of laparoscopic (endoscopic) radical prostatectomy

被引:39
作者
Stolzenburg, JU
Truss, MC
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Dept Urol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Urol, Hannover, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04206.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
During the last decade laparoscopy has become a standard technique available to the urologist, through constant technological advances and refinements. The progress of laparoscopic/endoscopic techniques allows the indications for this surgery to include complex oncological procedures like radical prostatectomy. Since the first description of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in the early 1990s the technique has undergone significant technical modifications. Transperitoneal LRP is now a standard procedure and can be used successfully and reproducibly, giving results comparable with those from the open retropubic procedure. Despite many advantages, transperitoneal laparoscopy is associated with potential intraperitoneal complications. Because of the limitations inherent in the transperitoneal route, a totally extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy (EERPE) has been developed. The totally extraperitoneal endoscopic access provides a safe and minimally invasive approach to various urological procedures, including prostatectomy. This technical improvement completely obviates intra-abdominal complications. EERPE combines the advantages of minimally invasive laparoscopy and the open retropubic approach. We review the surgical techniques of LRP and EERPE, and highlight the indications, contraindications and outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 757
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary results [J].
Abbou, CC ;
Salomon, L ;
Hoznek, A ;
Antiphon, P ;
Cicco, A ;
Saint, F ;
Alame, W ;
Bellot, J ;
Chopin, DK .
UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (05) :630-633
[2]   Laparoscopic bowel injury: Incidence and clinical presentation [J].
Bishoff, JT ;
Allaf, ME ;
Kirkels, W ;
Moore, RG ;
Kavoussi, LR ;
Schroder, F .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (03) :887-890
[3]   Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Results after 50 cases [J].
Bollens, R ;
Vanden Bossche, M ;
Roumeguere, T ;
Damoun, A ;
Ekane, S ;
Hoffmann, P ;
Zlotta, AR ;
Schulman, CC .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) :65-69
[4]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Is it feasible and reasonable? [J].
Cadeddu, JA ;
Kavoussi, LR .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (03) :655-+
[5]  
Coptcoat M J, 1995, Endosc Surg Allied Technol, V3, P9
[6]   EXTRAPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC STAGING PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION [J].
DAS, S ;
TASHIMA, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) :1321-1323
[7]  
DIAMOND MP, 1987, FERTIL STERIL, V47, P864
[8]   Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: Experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centers [J].
Fahlenkamp, D ;
Rassweiler, J ;
Fornara, P ;
Frede, T ;
Loening, SA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (03) :765-770
[9]   Hernia repair during endoscopic extraperitoneal lymph node dissection [J].
Ferzli, GS ;
Usal, H ;
Hayek, NE ;
Zeitlin, S ;
Hurwitz, JB ;
Albert, P .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 1997, 7 (03) :163-165
[10]   Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The montsouris 3-year experience [J].
Guillonneau, B ;
Rozet, F ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Lay, F ;
Barret, E ;
Doublet, JD ;
Baumert, H ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (01) :51-56