Wetting and Drying of Aqueous Droplets Containing Nonionic Surfactants CnEm

被引:6
作者
Shi, Jing [1 ]
Yang, Lisong [1 ]
Bain, Colin D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Dept Chem, Durham DH1 3LE, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
MICELLAR-SOLUTIONS; PHASE; WATER; EVAPORATION; TENSION; INTERFACE; MIXTURES; PARTICLE; DRIVEN; FLOW;
D O I
10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03479
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This paper presents a systematic study of the wetting and drying of aqueous pico-liter droplets containing nonionic surfactants polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers (CnEm; n = 10, 12, 14, m = 6 or 8) in comparison with the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The spreading and drying of droplets on hydrophilic substrates were studied by tracking the three-phase contact line (TCL) and by interferometry. CnEm droplets undergo phase separation during drying: a water-rich droplet retracts and leaves behind a thin film that is postulated to be a surfactant mesophase. This thin film either retracts or breaks up into small droplets on a longer time scale. The receding contact angle of the water-rich droplet on the thin film in the late stage of drying of CnEm droplets is independent of hydrophobicity of substrates, supporting the inference that a mesophase is present on the surface. Both CnEm and SDS solutions inhibit spreading on hydrophilic surfaces, which is attributed to Marangoni contraction as a result of a surface tension gradient across the gas-liquid interface. More pronounced suppression of spreading is observed in the case of CnEm solutions, possibly due to the phase transition of surfactant solution in the vicinity of the initial TCL leading to a viscous phase at the TCL that pins the droplet. Tracer particle measurements reveal that mild Marangoni flows exist for droplets with surfactant concentrations well above the critical micelle concentration (CMC). Origins of the surfactant gradients that result in Marangoni flows are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:4091 / 4101
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MATLAB PARTICLE TRAC
[2]   Modulation of the Coffee-Ring Effect in Particle/Surfactant Mixtures: the Importance of Particle-Interface Interactions [J].
Anyfantakis, Manos ;
Geng, Zheng ;
Morel, Mathieu ;
Rudiuk, Sergii ;
Baigl, Damien .
LANGMUIR, 2015, 31 (14) :4113-4120
[3]   A review of the rheology of the lamellar phase in surfactant systems [J].
Berni, MG ;
Lawrence, CJ ;
Machin, D .
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2002, 98 (02) :217-243
[4]   Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether nonionic surfactants: physicochemical properties and use for cholesterol determination in food [J].
Berthod, A ;
Tomer, S ;
Dorsey, JG .
TALANTA, 2001, 55 (01) :69-83
[5]   Spontaneous spreading of surfactant solutions on hydrophilic surfaces [J].
Cachile, M ;
Cazabat, AM ;
Bardon, S ;
Valignat, MP ;
Vandenbrouck, F .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 1999, 159 (01) :47-56
[6]   PHASE EQUILIBRIA OF DODECYLHEXAOXYETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOETHER IN WATER [J].
CLUNIE, JS ;
GOODMAN, JF ;
SYMONS, PC .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE FARADAY SOCIETY, 1969, 65 (553P) :287-&
[7]   THERMODYNAMICS OF NON-IONIC SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENT+WATER SYSTEMS [J].
CLUNIE, JS ;
CORKILL, JM ;
GOODMAN, JF ;
SYMONS, PC ;
TATE, JR .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE FARADAY SOCIETY, 1967, 63 (539P) :2839-&
[8]   Structural transition in the isotropic phase of the C12EO6/H2O lyotropic mixture:: A rheological investigation [J].
Constantin, D ;
Freyssingeas, É ;
Palierne, JF ;
Oswald, P .
LANGMUIR, 2003, 19 (07) :2554-2559
[9]   Suppression of the Coffee Ring Effect by Hydrosoluble Polymer Additives [J].
Cui, Liying ;
Zhang, Junhu ;
Zhang, Xuemin ;
Huang, Long ;
Wang, Zhanhua ;
Li, Yunfeng ;
Gao, Hainan ;
Zhu, Shoujun ;
Wang, Tieqiang ;
Yang, Bai .
ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, 2012, 4 (05) :2775-2780
[10]   The interactions between surfactants and the epicuticular wax on soybean or weed leaves: Maximal crop protection with minimal wax solubilization [J].
Damato, Tatiana Cardoso ;
Carrasco, Leticia D. M. ;
Carmona-Ribeiro, Ana Maria ;
Luiz, Ricardo Vagner ;
Godoy, Roberta ;
Petri, Denise F. S. .
CROP PROTECTION, 2017, 91 :57-65