An evaluation of network management protocols

被引:6
作者
Goncalves, Pedro [1 ]
Oliveira, Jose Luis [2 ]
Aguiar, Rui L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, ESTGA IT, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Univ Aveiro, DETI IT, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
来源
2009 IFIP/IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATED NETWORK MANAGEMENT (IM 2009) VOLS 1 AND 2 | 2009年
关键词
Network management; WBEM; Web services; SNMP; COPS; Diameter;
D O I
10.1109/INM.2009.5188859
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
During the last decade several network management solutions have been proposed or extended to cope with the growing complexity of networks, systems and services. Architectures, protocols, and information models have been proposed as a way to better respond to the new and different demands of global networks. However this offer also leads to a growing complexity of management solutions and to an increase in systems' requirements. The current management landscape is populated with a multiplicity of protocols, initially developed as an answer to different requirements. This paper presents a comparative study of currently common management protocols in All-IP networks: SNMP, COPS, Diameter, CIM/XML over HTTP and CIM/XML over SOAP. This assessment was focused on wireless aspect issues, and as such includes measures of bandwidth, packets, round-trip delays, and agents' requirements. We also analyzed the advantages of compression in these protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] [Anonymous], 1990, 1098 RFC
  • [12] BLUMENTHAL U, 1998, 2274 RFC
  • [13] Booth D., 2007, WEB SERVICES DESCRIP
  • [14] BOYLE J, 2000, 2749 RFC
  • [15] Brenner M., 2008, 5224 RFC
  • [16] Calhoun P., 2005, 4004 RFC
  • [17] Calhoun P., 2003, 3588 RFC
  • [18] CASE J, 1998, 2272 RFC
  • [19] Chan K., 2001, 3084 RFC
  • [20] de Lima WQ, 2006, IEEE IFIP NETW OPER, P546