A machine learning model for the prediction of down syndrome in second trimester antenatal screening

被引:23
作者
He, Falin [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Bo [3 ]
Mou, Kai [4 ]
Jin, Lizi [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Juntao [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Hosp, Natl Ctr Clin Labs, Natl Ctr Gerontol, Beijing Engn Res Ctr Lab Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Zibo Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Zibo, Peoples R China
关键词
Prenatal screening; Down syndrome; Machine learning; Random forest; IMPACT; SERUM; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.cca.2021.07.015
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Down syndrome (DS) is the most common human chromosomal abnormality. About 1200 laboratories carry out antenatal screening for DS in second trimester pregnancies in China. Their prenatal assessment of DS pregnancy risk is based on biometric calculations conducted on maternal serum biochemical markers and ultrasonic markers of fetal growth. However, the performance of this triple test for DS in second trimester pregnancies has a false positive rate of 5%, and a detection rate of about 60%similar to 65%. Method: A total of 58,972 pregnant women, including 49 DS cases, who had undergone DS screening in the second trimester were retrospectively included and a machine learning (ML) model based on random forest was built to predict DS. In addition, the model was applied to another hospital data set of 27,170 pregnant women, including 27 DS cases, to verify the predictive efficiency of the model. Results: The ML model gave a DS detection rate of 66.7%, with a 5% false positive rate in the model data set. In the external verification data set, the ML model achieved a DS detection rate of 85.2%, with a 5% false positive rate . In comparison with the current laboratory risk model, the ML model improves the DS detection rate with the same false positive rate, while the difference has no significance. Conclusions: The ML model for DS detection described here has a comparable detection rate with the same false positive rate as the DS risk screening software currently used in China. Our ML model exhibited robust performance and good extrapolation, and could function as an alternative tool for DS risk assessment in second trimester maternal serum.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 211
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey [J].
Abiodun, Oludare Isaac ;
Jantan, Aman ;
Omolara, Abiodun Esther ;
Dada, Kemi Victoria ;
Mohamed, Nachaat AbdElatif ;
Arshad, Humaira .
HELIYON, 2018, 4 (11)
[2]  
Bian Xu-Ming, 2008, Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, V43, P805
[3]   Down Syndrome [J].
Bull, Marilyn J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (24) :2344-2352
[4]   Machine learning in laboratory medicine: waiting for the flood? [J].
Cabitza, Federico ;
Banfi, Giuseppe .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 56 (04) :516-524
[5]   Biochemical screening for Down syndrome [J].
Cuckle, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (01) :97-101
[6]   Machine Learning in Medicine [J].
Deo, Rahul C. .
CIRCULATION, 2015, 132 (20) :1920-1930
[7]   Propensity score adjustment using machine learning classification algorithms to control selection bias in online surveys [J].
Ferri-Garcia, Ramon ;
del Mar Rueda, Maria .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (04)
[8]   The impact of maternal weight discrepancies on prenatal screening results for Down syndrome [J].
Huang, Tianhua ;
Meschino, Wendy S. ;
Okun, Nan ;
Dennis, Alan ;
Hoffman, Barry ;
Lepage, Nathalie ;
Rashid, Shamim ;
Aul, Ritu ;
Farrell, Sandra A. .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 33 (05) :471-476
[9]   Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for improved risk assessment for Down's syndrome [J].
Koivu, Aki ;
Korpimaki, Teemu ;
Kivela, Petri ;
Pahikkala, Tapio ;
Sairanen, Mikko .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 98 :1-7
[10]   Two-stage approach for risk estimation of fetal trisomy 21 and other aneuploidies using computational intelligence systems [J].
Neocleous, A. C. ;
Syngelaki, A. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. ;
Schizas, C. N. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 51 (04) :503-508