Effects of SO2 and NOx control on energy-efficiency power generation

被引:51
作者
Graus, W. H. J. [1 ]
Worrell, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecofys, NL-3526 KL Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
pollution control; power generation efficiency; emission control;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the effects of SO2 and NOx pollution control on the energy efficiency of fossil-fired power generation for the following countries: Australia, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and Norway aggregated), South Korea, UK and Ireland, and United States. Together these countries generate 65% of fossil-fired power generation worldwide. The level of SO2 and NOx control seems to vary widely for the included countries. The highest level of desulphurisation and denitrification is present in Japan, Germany, Nordic countries and South Korea. These countries also have the lowest NOx and SO2 emissions per unit of power generated. Limited pollution control is implemented in India and China, resulting in high specific NO, and SO2 emissions. The effect of NOx and SO2 control on net energy efficiency is estimated to be around 2% for coal-fired power plants and 1% for natural gas-fired power plants. The average power use for NOx and SO2 control for fossil-fired power generation is estimated to be between 1.2% and 1.5% of power generation output for countries with high levels of pollution control; leading to an effect on net efficiency of fossil-fired power generation of 0.5-0.6% points. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3898 / 3908
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Barrett M., 2004, ATMOSPHERIC EMISSION
  • [2] *BATT MEM I, 1998, CHIN EL POW OPT AN E
  • [3] *CAL AIR RES BOARD, 2000, AIR RES BOARD GUID P
  • [4] *CARN MELL U, 2006, IECM VERS 5 11 INT E
  • [5] *COEN, 2006, STEAM INJ VERS FGR R
  • [6] *EIA, 2002, AUSTR ENV ISS EN INF
  • [7] *EIA, 2004, IND ENV ISS EN INF A
  • [8] *ENT, 2005, PREP REV REL LARG CO
  • [9] Graus W, 2006, COMPARISON EFFICIENC
  • [10] *ICAC, 2006, ACID GAS SO2 CONTR T