How have people been coping during the COVID-19 pandemic? Patterns and predictors of coping strategies amongst 26,016 UK adults

被引:66
作者
Fluharty, Meg [1 ]
Fancourt, Daisy [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Behav Sci & Hlth, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, England
基金
英国科研创新办公室; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
COVID-19; Coping; Adversity; PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT; QUESTIONNAIRE F-SOZU; BRIEF FORM; STRESS; PERSONALITY; ASSOCIATIONS; LONELINESS; DEPRESSION; ETHNICITY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1186/s40359-021-00603-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background Individuals face increased psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it's unknown whether choice of coping styles are influenced by COVID-19 in addition to known predictors. Methods Data from 26,016 UK adults in the UCL COVID-19 Social Study were analysed from 12/4/2020 15/5/2020. Regression models were used to identify predictors of coping styles (problem-focused, emotion-focused, avoidant, and socially-supported): model 1 included sociodemographic variables, model 2 additionally included psychosocial factors, and model 3 further included experience of COVID-19 specific adverse worries or events. Results Sociodemographic and psychosocial predictors of coping align with usual predictors of coping styles not occurring during a pandemic. However, even when controlling for the wide range of these previously known predictors specific adversities were associated with use of specific strategies. Experience of worries about finances, basic needs, and events related to Covid-19 were associated with a range of strategies, while experience of financial adversities was associated with problem-focused, emotion-focused and avoidant coping. There were no associations between coping styles and experiencing challenges in meeting basic needs, but Covid-19 related adversities were associated with a lower use of socially-supported coping. Conclusions This paper demonstrates that there are not only demographic and social predictors of coping styles during the COVID-19 pandemic, but specific adversities are related to the ways that adults cope. Furthermore, this study identifies groups at risk of more avoidant coping mechanisms which may be targeted for supportive interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review [J].
Aldao, Amelia ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan ;
Schweizer, Susanne .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (02) :217-237
[2]   How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? [J].
Anderson, Roy M. ;
Heesterbeek, Hans ;
Klinkenberg, Don ;
Hollingsworth, T. Deirdre .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10228) :931-934
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, LANCET, V395, P1089, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30757-1
[4]  
[Anonymous], POPULATION ESTIMATES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, STRESS COPING ANTHOL
[6]   A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping [J].
Aspinwall, LG ;
Taylor, SE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (03) :417-436
[7]   Socioeconomic health disparities revisited: coping flexibility enhances health-related quality of life for individuals low in socioeconomic status [J].
Atal, Saloni ;
Cheng, Cecilia .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2016, 14
[8]   Emotional approach and problem-focused coping: A comparison of potentially adaptive strategies [J].
Baker, John P. ;
Berenbaum, Howard .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2007, 21 (01) :95-118
[9]   Surviving poverty: Stress and coping in the lives of housed and homeless mothers [J].
Banyard, VL ;
Graham-Bermann, SA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 1998, 68 (03) :479-489
[10]  
Beck AT, 1979, Cognitive Therapy of Depression