Augmented Reality-Guided Lumbar Facet Joint Injections

被引:48
作者
Agten, Christoph A. [1 ,2 ]
Dennler, Cyrill [2 ,3 ]
Rosskopf, Andrea B. [1 ,2 ]
Jaberg, Laurenz [2 ,3 ]
Pfirrmann, Christian W. A. [1 ,2 ]
Farshad, Mazda [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Balgrist, Dept Radiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Fac Med, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Balgrist, Dept Orthoped Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
augmented reality; lumber fact joints; injections; spine; phantom; mixed reality; IMAGE OVERLAY TECHNOLOGY; 1.5; T; VISUALIZATION; SYSTEM; REGISTRATION; PERFORMANCE; NAVIGATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0000000000000478
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and accuracy of augmented reality-guided lumbar facet joint injections. Materials and Methods A spine phantom completely embedded in hardened opaque agar with 3 ring markers was built. A 3-dimensional model of the phantom was uploaded to an augmented reality headset (Microsoft HoloLens). Two radiologists independently performed 20 augmented reality-guided and 20 computed tomography (CT)-guided facet joint injections each: for each augmented reality-guided injection, the hologram was manually aligned with the phantom container using the ring markers. The radiologists targeted the virtual facet joint and tried to place the needle tip in the holographic joint space. Computed tomography was performed after each needle placement to document final needle tip position. Time needed from grabbing the needle to final needle placement was measured for each simulated injection. An independent radiologist rated images of all needle placements in a randomized order blinded to modality (augmented reality vs CT) and performer as perfect, acceptable, incorrect, or unsafe. Accuracy and time to place needles were compared between augmented reality-guided and CT-guided facet joint injections. Results In total, 39/40 (97.5%) of augmented reality-guided needle placements were either perfect or acceptable compared with 40/40 (100%) CT-guided needle placements (P = 0.5). One augmented reality-guided injection missed the facet joint space by 2 mm. No unsafe needle placements occurred. Time to final needle placement was substantially faster with augmented reality guidance (mean 14 6 seconds vs 39 +/- 15 seconds, P < 0.001 for both readers). Conclusions Augmented reality-guided facet joint injections are feasible and accurate without potentially harmful needle placement in an experimental setting.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 498
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Anand M, 2014, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P6159, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6945035
[2]   MR-Guided Vertebroplasty With Augmented Reality Image Overlay Navigation [J].
Fritz, Jan ;
U-Thainual, Paweena ;
Ungi, Tamas ;
Flammang, Aaron J. ;
Kathuria, Sudhir ;
Fichtinger, Gabor ;
Iordachita, Iulian I. ;
Carrino, John A. .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (06) :1589-1596
[3]   Augmented Reality Visualization Using Image Overlay Technology for MR-Guided Interventions Cadaveric Bone Biopsy at 1.5 T [J].
Fritz, Jan ;
U-Thainual, Paweena ;
Ungi, Tamas ;
Flammang, Aaron J. ;
McCarthy, Edward F. ;
Fichtinger, Gabor ;
Iordachita, Iulian I. ;
Carrino, John A. .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (06) :464-470
[4]   Augmented reality visualisation using an image overlay system for MR-guided interventions: technical performance of spine injection procedures in human cadavers at 1.5 Tesla [J].
Fritz, Jan ;
U-Thainual, Paweena ;
Ungi, Tamas ;
Flammang, Aaron J. ;
Fichtinger, Gabor ;
Iordachita, Iulian I. ;
Carrino, John A. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (01) :235-245
[5]   Augmented Reality Visualization with Use of Image Overlay Technology for MR Imaging-guided Interventions: Assessment of Performance in Cadaveric Shoulder and Hip Arthrography at 1.5 T [J].
Fritz, Jan ;
U-Thainual, Paweena ;
Ungi, Tamas ;
Flammang, Aaron J. ;
Fichtinger, Gabor ;
Iordachita, Iulian I. ;
Carrino, John A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (01) :254-259
[6]   Augmented Reality Visualization With Image Overlay for MRI-Guided Intervention: Accuracy for Lumbar Spinal Procedures With a 1.5-T MRI System [J].
Fritz, Jan ;
U-Thainual, Paweena ;
Ungi, Tamas ;
Flammang, Aaron J. ;
Cho, Nathan B. ;
Fichtinger, Gabor ;
Iordachita, Iulian I. ;
Carrino, John A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (03) :W266-W273
[7]  
Hanna MG, 2018, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED
[8]  
Kikinis R., 2014, Intraoperative Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, P277, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7657-319, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7657-3_19]
[9]   BUILDING A HYBRID PATIENTS MODEL FOR AUGMENTED REALITY IN SURGERY - A REGISTRATION PROBLEM [J].
LAVALLEE, S ;
CINQUIN, P ;
SZELISKI, R ;
PERIA, O ;
HAMADEH, A ;
CHAMPLEBOUX, G ;
TROCCAZ, J .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1995, 25 (02) :149-164
[10]   Augmented reality surgical navigation with ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw placement: a pilot study [J].
Ma, Longfei ;
Zhao, Zhe ;
Chen, Fang ;
Zhang, Boyu ;
Fu, Ligong ;
Liao, Hongen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2017, 12 (12) :2205-2215