Smoking addiction: the shift from head to hands: Approach bias towards smoking-related cues in low-dependent versus dependent smokers

被引:11
作者
Detandt, Sandrine [1 ]
Bazan, Ariane [1 ]
Quertemont, Etienne [2 ]
Verbanck, Paul [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Serv Psychol Clin & Differentielle, Ave Roosevelt 50 CP 122, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Liege, Ctr Neurosci Cognit & Comportementale, Liege, Belgium
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Lab Psychol Med & Addictol, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Approach bias; attention; Go/NoGo task; incentive salience; smoking addiction; FAGERSTROM TOLERANCE QUESTIONNAIRE; NICOTINE DEPENDENCE; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR; CIGARETTE SMOKERS; ALCOHOL CUES; STROOP TASK; EX-SMOKERS; IMPLICIT;
D O I
10.1177/0269881117699606
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The dual process theory is central to several models of addiction, implying both an increase of stimulus salience and deficits in inhibitory control. Our major aim is to provide behavioral evidence for an approach bias tendency in smokers and more specifically during smoking cue exposure. The second aim is to examine whether this bias differs in low-dependent versus dependent smokers. Thirty-two smokers (17 low dependent and 15 dependent; cut-off FTND of 4) and 28 non-smokers performed a modified Go/NoGo task using tobacco-related words and neutral words as stimuli. Smokers generally made more mistakes and tended to be faster for smoking-related cues specifically. Low dependents acknowledged more their dependency in declarative questionnaires while making more errors and being slower specifically on smoking cues; dependent smokers were less prone to indicate their addiction, but were faster and accurate when it came to picking the smoking cues. These results suggest that a shift has operated from a mental preoccupation with smoking in the low-dependent group, to smoking as a motor habit in our dependent group. This finding invites experts to rethink smoking addiction in the light of this crucial moment, namely, the shift "from head to hands".
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 829
页数:11
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DOSS ADD
[2]  
[Anonymous], HLTH CONSMOK 50 YE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Publications and Reports of the Surgeon General
[4]   Modulation of feeding-induced activation of mesolimbic dopamine transmission by appetitive stimuli and its relation to motivational state [J].
Bassareo, V ;
Di Chiara, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 11 (12) :4389-4397
[5]   On the physiology of jouissance: interpreting the mesolimbic dopaminergic reward functions from a psychoanalytic perspective [J].
Bazan, Ariane ;
Detandt, Sandrine .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
[6]  
Berridge K.C., 1999, WELL BEING FDN HEDON, P527
[7]   What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? [J].
Berridge, KC ;
Robinson, TE .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1998, 28 (03) :309-369
[8]   Reward learning: Reinforcement, incentives, and expectations [J].
Berridge, KC .
PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION: ADVANCES IN RESEARCH AND THEORY, VOL 40, 2001, 40 :223-278
[9]   Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking [J].
Berridge, KC .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1996, 20 (01) :1-25
[10]   Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting [J].
Bradley, B ;
Field, M ;
Mogg, K ;
De Houwer, J .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 15 (01) :29-36