Technocratic Planning and Political Strategies: Territorial Policy in the EU Comment

被引:2
作者
Outhwaite, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Geog Polit & Sociol, Sociol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Macro-regions; Territorial Policy; Sovereignty; Cohesion; EUROPE; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1183
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
This commentary examines the EU's halting development of territorial policy, most recently in macro-regional planning, and the responses of member states' local and national governmental elites. Whether populist or not in their overall programmes, these elites have tended to resist EU initiatives in the name of a perceived national interest or to instrumentalise them in order to maximise their domestic political pay-off. These `sovereignty games' (Adler-Nissen and Gammeltoft-Hansen 2008) have been a constant feature of the European integration process, but transnational territorial initiatives, involving a flexible mix of European and sub-regional bodies as well as national states (both members and non-members of the EU) tend to raise the stakes in these games.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 101
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
[31]   Discussing strategies for social Europe: The potential role of EU law in contributing to the Union's policy objective of fighting poverty and social exclusion [J].
Aranguiz, Ane ;
Verschueren, Herwig .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2020, 22 (04) :367-375
[32]   European Union Competition Policy and the European Territorial Cohesion Agenda: An Impossible Reconciliation? State Aid Rules and Public Service Liberalization through the European Spatial Planning Lens [J].
Colomb, Claire ;
Santinha, Goncalo .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2014, 22 (03) :459-480