Dose assessment in contrast enhanced digital mammography using simple phantoms simulating standard model breasts

被引:3
作者
Bouwman, R. W. [1 ]
van Engen, R. E. [1 ]
Young, K. C. [2 ,3 ]
Veldkamp, W. J. H. [1 ,4 ]
Dance, D. R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, LRCB, Dutch Reference Ctr Screening, NL-6532 SZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, NCCPM, Guildford GU2 7XX, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Dept Phys, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
quality control; contrast enhanced spectral mammography; average glandular dose; breast phantom; DOSIMETRY PROTOCOLS; UK;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/1/N1
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Slabs of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) or a combination of PMMA and polyethylene (PE) slabs are used to simulate standard model breasts for the evaluation of the average glandular dose (AGD) in digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). These phantoms are optimized for the energy spectra used in DM and DBT, which normally have a lower average energy than used in contrast enhanced digital mammography (CEDM). In this study we have investigated whether these phantoms can be used for the evaluation of AGD with the high energy x-ray spectra used in CEDM. For this purpose the calculated values of the incident air kerma for dosimetry phantoms and standard model breasts were compared in a zero degree projection with the use of an anti scatter grid. It was found that the difference in incident air kerma compared to standard model breasts ranges between -10% to +4% for PMMA slabs and between 6% and 15% for PMMA-PE slabs. The estimated systematic error in the measured AGD for both sets of phantoms were considered to be sufficiently small for the evaluation of AGD in quality control procedures for CEDM. However, the systematic error can be substantial if AGD values from different phantoms are compared.
引用
收藏
页码:N1 / N7
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, CATALOGUE DIAGNOSTIC
  • [2] Berger M., NIST, PML, DOI [10.18434/T48G6X, DOI 10.18434/T48G6X]
  • [3] Phantoms for quality control procedures in digital breast tomosynthesis: dose assessment
    Bouwman, R. W.
    Diaz, O.
    van Engen, R. E.
    Young, K. C.
    den Heeten, G. J.
    Broeders, M. J. M.
    Veldkamp, W. J. H.
    Dance, D. R.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (13) : 4423 - 4438
  • [4] Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols
    Dance, D. R.
    Young, K. C.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (09) : 2127 - 2137
  • [5] Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols
    Dance, D. R.
    Young, K. C.
    van Engen, R. E.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (02) : 453 - 471
  • [6] Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols
    Dance, D. R.
    Young, K. C.
    van Engen, R. E.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (14) : 4361 - 4372
  • [7] Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol
    Dance, DR
    Skinner, CL
    Young, KC
    Beckett, JR
    Kotre, CJ
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (11) : 3225 - 3240
  • [8] Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms
    Dance, DR
    Hunt, RA
    Bakic, PR
    Maidment, ADA
    Sandborg, M
    Ullman, G
    Carlsson, GA
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) : 359 - 363
  • [9] MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION OF CONVERSION FACTORS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF MEAN GLANDULAR BREAST DOSE
    DANCE, DR
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (09) : 1211 - 1219
  • [10] Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results
    Dromain, Clarisse
    Thibault, Fabienne
    Muller, Serge
    Rimareix, Francoise
    Delaloge, Suzette
    Tardivon, Anne
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) : 565 - 574