Developmental Surveillance and Screening Practices by Pediatric Primary Care Providers Implications for Early Intervention Professionals

被引:16
作者
Porter, Sallie [1 ]
Qureshi, Rubab [2 ]
Caldwell, Barbara Ann [1 ]
Echevarria, Mercedes [1 ]
Dubbs, William B. [3 ]
Sullivan, Margaret W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Sch Nursing, Div Adv Practice Nursing, 65 Bergen St, Newark, NJ 07101 USA
[2] Rutgers Sch Nursing, Div Nursing Sci, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Rutgers Sch Nursing, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
developmental delay; developmental monitoring; developmental risk; developmental screening; developmental surveillance; pediatric primary care; ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1097/IYC.0000000000000057
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This study used a survey approach to investigate current developmental surveillance and developmental screening practices by pediatric primary care providers in a diverse New Jersey county. A total of 217 providers were contacted with a final sample size of 57 pediatric primary care respondents from 13 different municipalities. Most providers (73.7%) began developmental surveillance at the first nonhospital health supervision visit, usually at 3-5 days of life. About half of responding providers (51.8%) did surveillance and/or screening at all health encounters, whereas the remaining providers (48.2%) did surveillance and/or screening at only well child visits. The majority of providers (63.6%) report using a formal tool for developmental screening. There was variation in the particular developmental tool used for screening that included the use of both standardized formal and nonstandardized informal tools. Disparities in practice were associated with the patient's type of insurance, age at surveillance and/or screening initiation, and the time frame of surveillance and screening. Implications for early intervention practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 101
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Advocates for Children of New Jersey, 2013, NEW KINDS COUNT 2012
  • [2] Advocates for Children of New Jersey, 2014, NEW KIDS COUNT 2014
  • [3] [Anonymous], SURV WELL BEING YOUN
  • [4] Rates of Parent-Centered Developmental Screening: Disparities and Links to Services Access
    Bethell, Christina
    Reuland, Colleen
    Schor, Edward
    Abrahms, Melinda
    Halfon, Neal
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2011, 128 (01) : 146 - 155
  • [5] The impact of adverse childhood experiences on an urban pediatric population
    Burke, Nadine J.
    Hellman, Julia L.
    Scott, Brandon G.
    Weems, Carl F.
    Carrion, Victor G.
    [J]. CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2011, 35 (06) : 408 - 413
  • [6] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013, COMM HLTH STAT IND
  • [7] Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: An algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening
    Duby, John C.
    Lipkin, Paul H.
    Macias, Michelle M.
    Wegner, Lynn M.
    Duncan, Paula
    Hagan, Joseph F., Jr.
    Cooley, W. Carl
    Swigonski, Nancy
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2006, 118 (01) : 405 - 420
  • [8] Early Childhood Adversity, Toxic Stress, and the Role of the Pediatrician: Translating Developmental Science Into Lifelong Health
    Garner, Andrew S.
    Shonkoff, Jack P.
    Siegel, Benjamin S.
    Dobbins, Mary I.
    Earls, Marian F.
    Garner, Andrew S.
    McGuinn, Laura
    Pascoe, John
    Wood, David L.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2012, 129 (01) : E224 - E231
  • [9] Screening for developmental and behavioral problems
    Glascoe, FP
    [J]. MENTAL RETARDATION AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2005, 11 (03): : 173 - 179
  • [10] Parents' evaluation of developmental status: How well do parents' concerns identify children with behavioral and emotional problems?
    Glascoe, FP
    [J]. CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2003, 42 (02) : 133 - 138