Sedimentary and tectonic architecture of a large push moraine: a case study from Hagafellsjokull-Eystri, Iceland

被引:37
作者
Bennett, MR
Huddart, D
Waller, RI
Cassidy, N
Tomio, A
Zukowskyj, P
Midgley, NG
Cook, SJ
Gonzalez, S
Glasser, NF
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Sch Conservat Sci, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[2] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Biol & Earth Sci, Liverpool L3 3AF, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Keele, Sch Earth Sci & Geog, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Geociencias, BR-05508080 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Hertfordshire, Div Geog & Environm Sci, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[6] Univ Wales, Ctr Glaciol, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, Ceredigion, Wales
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
push moraines; glaciotectonic deformation; ground penetrating radar;
D O I
10.1016/j.sedgeo.2004.10.002
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Using a combination of geological and geophysical techniques (Ground Penetrating Radar), we explore the tectonic architecture of a push moraine formed just after the 1890 Neoglacial ice maximum of Hagafellsjokull-Eyssui in central Iceland. The push moraine formed by a re-advance, perhaps a surge., of the glacier against a moraine bank-delta sometime between 1890 and 1929. Different tectonic architectures exist in two adjacent parts of the same push moraine complex. In one location. the ice advance pushed the delta pro-glacially to form a prominent single-crested push moraine. Deformation occurred along a single listric decollement over which a large nappe moved, as a result of ice-margrinal pushing. In an adjacent location, the ice-margin mounted and advanced over the ice-contact delta to create a push moraine at the limit of the advance by sub-glarial gravity-spreading. In this case, deformation occurred along a series of listric thrusts and by folding within the distal parts of the overridden delta. The geomechanical causes of these two contrasting styles of deformation, present in adjacent sectors of the same ice-marginal flow unit, are discussed and a range of possible controls identified. These include variation along the former ice-margin and foreland in: (1) glacier-foreland coupling; (2) foreland shear strength; and (3) the frictional characteristics of the decollement. Some combination of these variables provides the most Rely cause. The case study presented in this paper provides an example of the potential for rapid variation in the tectonic architecture of a push moraine along strike. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 292
页数:24
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Aber J. S., 1989, GLACIOTECTONIC LANDF
[2]  
[Anonymous], GLACIATED CONTINENTA
[3]  
Ashley G.M., 1995, MODERN GLACIAL ENV P, V1, P417
[4]   A comparison of Ground-Penetrating Radar facies and sediment characteristics in a Pleistocene push moraine in the Netherlands [J].
Bakker, MAJ .
GPR 2002: NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GROUND PENETRATING RADAR, 2002, 4758 :317-322
[5]  
Benn D.I., 1998, Glaciers glaciation
[6]   The morphology, structural evolution and significance of push moraines [J].
Bennett, MP .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2001, 53 (3-4) :197-236
[7]   An integrated approach to the study of glaciolacustrine landforms and sediments: a case study from Hagavatn, Iceland [J].
Bennett, MR ;
Huddart, D ;
McCormick, T .
QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2000, 19 (07) :633-665
[8]   Surges of glaciers in Iceland [J].
Björnsson, H ;
Pálsson, F ;
Sigurdsson, O ;
Flowers, GE .
ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, VOL 36, 2003, 36 :82-90
[9]   Palaeoglaciology of an ice sheet through a glacial cycle: the European ice sheet through the Weichselian [J].
Boulton, GS ;
Dongelmans, P ;
Punkari, M ;
Broadgate, M .
QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2001, 20 (04) :591-625
[10]   PUSH-MORAINES AND GLACIER-CONTACT FANS IN MARINE AND TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS [J].
BOULTON, GS .
SEDIMENTOLOGY, 1986, 33 (05) :677-698